Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure for beginners to perform: experience from 1948 cases

被引:9
作者
Lee, Gyeo Ra [1 ]
Kim, Ji Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Chang Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Yoon Suk [2 ]
Kim, Jin Jo [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 665,Bupyung 6 Dong, Incheon 403720, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, 222 Banpo Daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 06期
关键词
Appendectomy; SILS appendectomy; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery; ONE-TROCAR APPENDECTOMY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-020-07744-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIL-A) has recently become an option for treating appendicitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and surgical outcomes of SIL-A by residents and surgeons during the learning period. Methods A total of 1948 consecutive patients who underwent SIL-A from May 2008 to November 2014 were studied retrospectively. Surgeries were performed by residents and eight surgeons. Prior to the first case, surgeons and residents had been trained in a training protocol during the learning period. Three initial cases of SIL-A were performed under the supervision of experienced surgeons. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (learning period,n = 483), the first 40 cases by each surgeon and resident; and group 2 (experienced period,n = 1465), cases after the 40th procedure performed by each surgeon. Surgical results were compared between the two groups by performing propensity score matching analysis. Results After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in patient demographics and characteristics of appendicitis between the two groups. The operating time was longer in group 1 than in group 2 (45.3 +/- 18.0vs.33.9 +/- 16.1 min,p < 0.001). The morbidity rate (7.0% vs. 6.5%,p = 0.795) was similar between the two groups. Readmission rate (2.1% vs. 1.3%,p = 0.414) and reoperation rate (0.8% vs. 0.8%,p = 0.348) were also similar between the two groups. However, the rate of incisional hernia occurrence (0.6% vs. 0%,p = 0.066) tended to be larger in group 1 than in group 2 without showing a significant difference. Conclusion SIL-A is a technically feasible and safe procedure when it is performed by residents and surgeons during learning period under an appropriate training protocol. However, residents and surgeons in the learning period should perform it carefully to prevent incisional hernias.
引用
收藏
页码:2997 / 3002
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aly, Omar E.
    Black, Douglas H.
    Rehman, Haroon
    Ahmed, Irfan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 35 : 120 - 128
  • [2] Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons
    Baumgarten, Heron D.
    Brown, Erin G.
    Russell, Kathryn W.
    Adzick, N. Scott
    Laje, Pablo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (02) : 276 - 279
  • [3] Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes at a single institution
    Buckley, F. Paul, III
    Vassaur, Hannah
    Monsivais, Sharon
    Jupiter, Daniel
    Watson, Rob
    Eckford, John
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (02): : 626 - 630
  • [4] Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis
    Chow, Andre
    Purkayastha, Sanjay
    Nehme, Jean
    Darzi, Ara
    Paraskeva, Paraskevas
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (10): : 2567 - 2574
  • [5] Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-Incision Appendectomy
    Dolores Frutos, Ma
    Abrisqueta, Jesus
    Juan Lujan
    Abellan, Israel
    Parrilla, Pascual
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (03) : 413 - 418
  • [6] One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery
    Esposito, C
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (02): : 177 - 178
  • [7] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
    FRAZEE, RC
    ROBERTS, JW
    SYMMONDS, RE
    SNYDER, SK
    HENDRICKS, JC
    SMITH, RW
    CUSTER, MD
    HARRISON, JB
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (06) : 725 - 731
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis
    Golub, R
    Siddiqui, F
    Pohl, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) : 545 - 553
  • [9] Can laparoscopic appendectomy be safely performed by surgical residents without prior experience of open appendectomy?
    Hiramatsu, Kosuke
    Toda, Shigeo
    Tate, Tomohiro
    Fukui, Yudai
    Tomizawa, Kenji
    Hanaoka, Yutaka
    Moriyama, Jin
    Matoba, Shuichiro
    Kuroyanagi, Hiroya
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 41 (03) : 270 - 273
  • [10] Resident involvement in laparoscopic procedures does not worsen clinical outcomes but may increase operative times and length of hospital stay
    Jolley, Jennifer
    Lomelin, Daniel
    Simorov, Anton
    Tadaki, Carl
    Oleynikov, Dmitry
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (09): : 3783 - 3791