Slow component apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer: Comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic evaluation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

被引:4
作者
Ogura, Akio [1 ]
Maeda, Fumie [2 ]
Yahata, Seiji [3 ]
Koyama, Daisuke [4 ]
Tsunoda, Fumiya [5 ]
Hayashi, Norio [1 ]
Motegi, Shunichi [6 ]
Yamamura, Kenichiro [7 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Prefectural Coll Hlth Sci, Grad Sch, 323-1 Kamioki Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
[2] Kyoto City Hosp, Dept Radiol, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Tokyo Womens Med Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Natl Hosp Org Matsumoto Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
[5] Japanese Red Cross Asikaga Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ashikaga, Tochigi, Japan
[6] Josai Clin, Dept Radiol, Togane, Chiba, Japan
[7] Osaka Med Coll Hosp, Dept Radiol, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnostic imaging; Prostate; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2019.01.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE)-MRI has high diagnostic performance of prostate cancer. However, it is preferable to avoid the use of MRI contrast media. A study reported that the diagnosability of the wash-in index of DCE-MRI was equivalent to the intravoxel incoherent motion of the diffusion weighted image. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between the slow component apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the wash-out index of the DCE. Materials and methods: Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with prostate cancer by biopsy were enrolled in this study. The fast and slow component ADCs of the DWI were calculated for 76 points of the tumor and the contralateral normal parts. Furthermore, the wash-in and wash-out indices of the DCE-MRI were calculated. The correlations for each calculated index were compared. Results: There was a significant difference between the tumor and the contralateral normal parts for both fast (p = 0.03) and slow component (p < 0.01) ADCs. In addition, the slow component ADC was correlated with the wash-out index (r = 0.64). Conclusion: The slow component ADC was correlated with the wash-out index, and may, therefore, be a suitable substitute for DCE-MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Takeuchi, Mayumi
    Matsuzaki, Kenji
    Harada, Masafumi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 17 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [42] Are Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Images Necessary for Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
    Mussi, Thais Caldara
    Martins, Tatiana
    Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
    Filippi, Renee Zon
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (03) : E447 - E454
  • [43] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient as treatment response markers of skull base osteomyelitis: a preliminary study
    Baba, Akira
    Kurokawa, Ryo
    Kurokawa, Mariko
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 88 : e319 - e324
  • [44] DIFFERENTIATION OF HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS FROM METASTASES BY DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    HAMM, B
    FISCHER, E
    TAUPITZ, M
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (02) : 205 - 216
  • [45] Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Techniques for Localization of Peripheral Zone Tumor
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Sabach, Amy
    Babb, James S.
    Matza, Brent W.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (03) : W471 - W478
  • [46] Prostate cancer tumor grade differentiation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the rat: Comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media - Preliminary experience
    Gossmann, A
    Okuhata, Y
    Shames, DM
    Helbich, TH
    Roberts, TPL
    Wendland, MF
    Huber, S
    Brasch, RC
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 265 - 272
  • [47] Comparison between PUN and Tofts models in the quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Mazzetti, S.
    Gliozzi, A. S.
    Bracco, C.
    Russo, F.
    Regge, D.
    Stasi, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (24) : 8443 - 8453
  • [48] Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison and correlation with dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging
    Lai, Vincent
    Lee, Victor Ho Fun
    Lam, Ka On
    Huang, Bingsheng
    Chan, Queenie
    Khong, Pek Lan
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (40) : 68472 - 68482
  • [49] Pancreatic Cancer: Utility of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in Assessment of Antiangiogenic Therapy
    Akisik, M. Fatih
    Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan
    Bu, Guixue
    Lin, Chen
    Hutchins, Gary D.
    Chiorean, Elena G.
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (02) : 441 - 449
  • [50] Perfusion Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Diffusion-weighted MRI: Association with Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer
    Lee, Hyun Sil
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Baek, Ji Eun
    Song, Byung Joo
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 446 - 456