EVIDENCE OF in vivo GENOTOXICITY INDUCED BY EXTREMELY-LOW FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS COMPARED WITH IONIZING RADIATION AND A CHEMICAL MUTAGEN

被引:0
作者
Heredia-Rojas, J. A. [1 ]
Beltcheva, M. [2 ]
Metcheva, R. [2 ]
Gomez-Flores, R. [1 ]
Rodriguez de la Fuente, A. O. [1 ]
Heredia-Rodriguez, O. [1 ]
Rodriguez-Flores, L. E. [3 ]
Castaneda-Garza, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Fac Ciencias Biol, Av Univ S-N Ciudad Univ, San Nicolas De Los Garza 66451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[2] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Res, 1 Tzar Osvoboditel Blvd, Sofia 1000, Bulgaria
[3] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon UANL, Fac Med, Av Francisco I Madero Pte S-N, Monterrey 66460, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY | 2018年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
extremely low frequency magnetic fields; ionizing radiation; chemical mutagens; micronucleus test; genotoxicity; DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; DNA-DAMAGE; 60; HZ; SINGLE; EXPOSURE; CELLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and waves encompass a ubiquitous and very broad range of frequencies in the modern environment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the genotoxic potential of 60-Hz EMFs compared with ionizing (gamma rays) radiation and Mitomycin-C (MMC), a well-known genotoxic agent. The frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MN) in bone marrow was evaluated in three-month-old male BALB/c mice exposed to 0.1, 0.2 and 1.0 Gy gamma rays, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 mT EMF, 5 mg/kg MMC alone or the combinations 0.1, 0.2, or 1 Gy + MMC, and 2.0 mT EMF + MMC. Statistically significant differences on MN frequency due to genotoxic effect were observed after exposure to 1.0 Gy gamma rays, 1.5 and 2.0 EMFs, and MMC, as compared with controls. In addition, co-exposure to gamma rays and MMC significantly increased MN frequency, as compared with treatments alone. In contrast, an antagonistic effect between EMF treatment and MMC was observed. In conclusion, the present study indicates in vivo susceptibility of mice to the genotoxicity potential of EMFs compared with ionizing radiation and a chemical mutagen.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1269
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ahuja YR, 1999, INDIAN J BIOCHEM BIO, V36, P318
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1976, The Micronucleus Test for Cytogenetic Analysis
  • [3] Heredia-Rojas JA, 2017, ACTA ZOOL BULGAR, P69
  • [4] Electromagnetic cellular interactions
    Cifra, Michal
    Fields, Jeremy Z.
    Farhadi, Ashkan
    [J]. PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2011, 105 (03) : 223 - 246
  • [5] Are environmental electromagnetic fields genotoxic?
    Crumpton, MJ
    Collins, AR
    [J]. DNA REPAIR, 2004, 3 (10) : 1385 - 1387
  • [6] FAIRBAIRN DW, 1994, CELL MOL BIOL, V40, P561
  • [7] FILMANOWICZ E, 1961, J LAB CLIN MED, V57, P65
  • [8] Florou H, 2009, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V10, P807
  • [9] Review of Studies Concerning Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposure Assessment in Europe: Low Frequency Fields (50 Hz-100 kHz)
    Gajsek, Peter
    Ravazzani, Paolo
    Grellier, James
    Samaras, Theodoros
    Bakos, Jozsef
    Thuroczy, Gyorgy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (09)
  • [10] Lack of alterations on meiotic chromosomes and morphological characteristics of male germ cells in mice exposed to a 60 Hz and 2.0 mT magnetic field
    Heredia-Rojas, JA
    Caballero-Hernandez, DE
    Rodriguez-de la Fuente, AO
    Ramos-Alfano, G
    Rodriguez-Flores, LE
    [J]. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2004, 25 (01) : 63 - 68