Experimental investigation of the leak-off effect on proppant transportation and distribution in a vertical fracture

被引:16
作者
Li, Jun [1 ]
Kuang, Shibo [1 ]
Qi, Zheng [1 ]
Liu, Pingli [2 ]
Yu, Aibing [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Chem Engn, ARC Res Hub Computat Particle Technol, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Southwest Petr Univ, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 611630, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Fluid leak-off; Hydraulic fracturing; Laboratory tests; Proppant distribution; Shale gas; Vertical fracture model; EMISSIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104358
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Proppant placement inside hydraulic fractures is a key factor during gas production from unconventional gas reservoirs. Fracturing fluid somewhat leaks off through natural fractures when fracturing naturally fractured reservoirs, which affects proppant transportation and distribution. However, this phenomenon has often been neglected in existing experimental fracture models for simplicity. To date, the influence of leak-off on proppant placement remains unclear. This study aimed to build a leak-off vertical fracture model. Laboratory tests on proppant transportation and distribution were conducted using this model at different locations and controlled rates of fluid leak-off through valves simulating natural fractures. The experimental results showed that when the leak-off at the front was more severe than other leak-off locations, the deep fracture suffered the problem of large empty areas and thus ineffective proppant support. The interaction between leak-off location and alternating proppant injection mode was also studied to mitigate the adverse effect of leak-off. Accordingly, the pumping of small-sized proppant particles and then large-sized proppant particles was proposed for the case of severe leak-off in the front fracture. Such a mode led to a uniform proppant distribution throughout the fracture.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Abell B., 2019, SPE AAPG SEG UNC RES, P17
[2]   Forecasting Natural Gas Production Using Various Regression Models [J].
Aydin, G. .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15-16) :1486-+
[3]   Production Modeling in the Oil and Natural Gas Industry: An Application of Trend Analysis [J].
Aydin, G. .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 32 (05) :555-564
[4]   Analysis and Mitigation Opportunities of Methane Emissions from the Energy Sector [J].
Aydin, G. ;
Karakurt, I. ;
Aydiner, K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2012, 34 (11) :967-982
[5]   Integration of genetic algorithm, computer simulation and design of experiments for forecasting electrical energy consumption [J].
Azadeh, A. ;
Tarverdian, S. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (10) :5229-5241
[6]  
Babcock R.E., 1967, DISTRIBUTION PROPPIN
[7]  
Barree R.D., 1994, SPE ANN TECHN C EXH
[8]   The effects of proppant on the near-front behavior of a hydraulic fracture [J].
Bessmertnykh, Alena ;
Dontsov, Egor ;
Ballarini, Roberto .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2020, 235
[9]   Proppant transport in a scaled vertical planar fracture: Vorticity and dune placement [J].
Fernandez, Macias E. ;
Sanchez, Martin ;
Pugnaloni, Luis A. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 173 :1382-1389
[10]   A comprehensive model for simulating fracturing fluid leakoff in natural fractures [J].
Guo, Jianchun ;
Liu, Yuxuan .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 21 :977-985