Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A potential exclusion diagnosis modality in dense breast patients

被引:14
作者
Qin, Yun [1 ]
Liu, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Xueqin [1 ]
Zhao, Shuang [1 ]
Zhong, Huanhuan [1 ]
Huang, Juan [1 ]
Yu, Jianqun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Radiol, West China Hosp, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2020年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
breast cancer; contrast-enhanced spectral mammography; diagnostic efficiency; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; pathology; CANCER; WOMEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2877
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background China has an increasing burden of breast cancer. However, with a large population of dense breast patients, the diagnostic efficiency of conventional digital mammography is attenuated. Methods From July 2017 to October 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 397 dense breast patients who underwent contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in West China Hospital. Among them, 53 patients who had both CESM and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) results and 114 patients who had pathological diagnoses were finally enrolled. All images were reviewed by two independent radiologists according to the 2013 Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) with all disagreements handed to an associate professor for final decisions. Correlation analyses between CESM and DCE-MRI were conducted. The diagnostic performance of CESM were investigated. Results The kappa value of the BI-RADS scores between CESM and DCE-MRI was 0.607 (P < .001), indicating high correspondence between CESM and DCE-MRI. As for lesion size measurement, moderate correlation (Kendall's tau coefficient: 0.556, P < .001) was detected between CESM and DCE-MRI. Using pathological diagnoses as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CESM were 82.4%, 96.4%, and 0.894, respectively. Conclusion CESM demonstrated excellent overall diagnostic accuracy and a moderate correlation in lesion size estimation against DCE-MRI in dense breast patients, supporting it to be an alternative to DCE-MRI in breast cancer detection and diagnosis, especially for exclusion diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:2653 / 2659
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Can Radiologists Predict the Presence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer? [J].
Aminololama-Shakeri, Shadi ;
Flowers, Chris I. ;
McLaren, Christine E. ;
Wisner, Dorota J. ;
de Guzman, Jade ;
Campbell, Joan E. ;
Bassett, Lawrence W. ;
Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee ;
Gerlach, Karen ;
Hargreaves, Jonathan ;
Elson, Sarah L. ;
Retallack, Hanna ;
Joe, Bonnie N. ;
Feig, Stephen A. ;
Wells, Colin J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (04) :933-939
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J MED IMAGING, DOI DOI 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.031011
[3]   Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer BI-RADS 4 Lesions During 2003-2008 in the National Cancer Institute Thailand [J].
Chaiwerawattana, Arkom ;
Thanasitthichai, Somchai ;
Boonlikit, Sarawan ;
Apiwanich, Chanin ;
Worawattanakul, Suvipapan ;
Intakawin, Anothai ;
Rakiad, Supattra ;
Thongkham, Kanchana .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (08) :4063-4066
[4]   Characteristics of breast cancer in Central China, literature review and comparison with USA [J].
Chen, Chuang ;
Sun, Si ;
Yuan, Jing-Ping ;
Wang, Yao-Huai ;
Cao, Tian-Ze ;
Zheng, Hong-Mei ;
Jiang, Xue-Qing ;
Gong, Yi-Ping ;
Tu, Yi ;
Yao, Feng ;
Hu, Ming-Bai ;
Li, Juan-Juan ;
Sun, Sheng-Rong ;
Wei, Wen .
BREAST, 2016, 30 :208-213
[5]  
Chen YL, 2017, MOL CLIN ONCOL, V6, P157, DOI 10.3892/mco.2016.1108
[6]   Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Chen, Shin-Chih .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (04) :1082-1089
[7]   Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis [J].
Cheung, Yun-Chung ;
Lin, Yu-Ching ;
Wan, Yung-Liang ;
Yeow, Kee-Min ;
Huang, Pei-Chin ;
Lo, Yung-Feng ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Pei ;
Ueng, Shir-Hwa ;
Chang, Chee-Jen .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (10) :2394-2403
[8]   International Variation in Female Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates [J].
DeSantis, Carol E. ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Lortet-Tieulent, Joannie ;
Anderson, Benjamin O. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (10) :1495-1506
[9]   ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database [J].
Elezaby, Mai ;
Li, Geng ;
Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
DeMartini, Wendy B. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (02) :416-422
[10]  
Gradishar W, 2018, NCCN GUIDELINES VERS, V20