Random-start ovarian stimulation in women desiring elective cryopreservation of oocytes

被引:28
|
作者
Pereira, Nigel [1 ]
Voskuilen-Gonzalez, Anna [1 ]
Hancock, Kolbe [2 ]
Lekovich, Jovana P. [1 ]
Schattman, Glenn L. [1 ]
Rosenwaks, Zev [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Ronald O Perelman & Claudia Cohen Ctr Reprod Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
关键词
elective oocyte cryopreservation; oocyte cryopreservation; ovarian stimulation; random-start; social oocyte cryopreservation; HUMAN MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; LUTEAL-PHASE; CANCER-PATIENTS; FOLLICULAR DEVELOPMENT; SPERM INJECTION; VITRIFICATION; AGE; RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The current study investigates the utility of random-start ovarian stimulation in women desiring elective oocyte cryopreservation. Women in the study cohort underwent random-start ovarian stimulation, and were subdivided based on the phase of the menstrual cycle that ovarian stimulation began, i. e. early follicular, late follicular or luteal phase. Women undergoing conventional cycle day (CD) 2/3 ovarian stimulation start were controls. A total of 1302 women were included -859 (66.0%) conventional CD 2/3, 342 (26.3%) early follicular, 42 (3.2%) late follicular and 59 (4.5%) luteal ovarian stimulation starts. There was no difference in the demographics or baseline ovarian stimulation characteristics. The duration of ovarian stimulation (11 versus 9 days; P < 0.001) and total dosage of gonadotrophins administered (4095.5 versus 3155 IU; P < 0.001) was higher in the random-start group. The number of total and MII oocytes in the control and random-start groups was similar. A non-significant trend towards increased cycle cancellation was noted in the late follicular start group (7.1%). Study findings indicate the number of total and MII oocytes derived from random-start protocols initiated during any phase of the menstrual cycle is similar to conventional CD 2/3 ovarian stimulation start protocols in women desiring elective oocyte cryopreservation. (C) 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 406
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger increases the number of oocytes and embryos available for cryopreservation in cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Pereira, Nigel
    Kelly, Amelia G.
    Stone, Logan D.
    Witzke, Justine D.
    Lekovich, Jovana P.
    Elias, Rony T.
    Schattman, Glenn L.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : 532 - 538
  • [32] Comparison of Oocyte and Embryo Quality Between Random Start and Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Cycles in Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation
    Güler İsrafilova
    Yavuz Emre Şükür
    Sinan Özkavukcu
    Meltem Aksu Sönmezer
    Cem Somer Atabekoğlu
    Batuhan Özmen
    Bülent Berker
    Ruşen Aytaç
    Acar Koç
    Murat Sönmezer
    Reproductive Sciences, 2021, 28 : 2200 - 2207
  • [33] Differences in perceived stress during ovarian stimulation between women with infertility and those pursing oocyte cryopreservation
    Adeleye, Amanda
    Cruz, Katrina
    Pasch, Lauri
    Huddleston, Heather
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (05) : 1076 - 1084
  • [34] Association of serum AMH levels with the number of oocytes retrieved in adolescent and young adult women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
    Kim, Sung Woo
    Son, Hee Jin
    Han, Ji Yeon
    Kim, Hoon
    Ku, Seung-Yup
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2025, 311 (03) : 811 - 818
  • [35] Maximize the safety and efficacy of fertility preservation by random start/dual ovarian stimulation for early breast cancer patients
    Young, Shih-Hung Richard
    Chang, Yi-En
    Yang, Wei-Chung Vivian
    Lu, Buo-Jia
    Chou, Szu-Yuan
    Chen, Chi -Huang
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (02): : 330 - 333
  • [36] Random start ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation appears unlikely to delay initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Letourneau, Joseph M.
    Sinha, Nikita
    Wald, Kaitlyn
    Harris, Eve
    Quinn, Molly
    Imbar, Tal
    Mok-Lin, Evelyn
    Chien, A. Jo
    Rosen, Mitchell
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (10) : 2123 - 2129
  • [37] Elective cryopreservation of all embryos in women at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome may not prevent the condition but reduces the live birth rate
    Awonuga, AO
    Pittrof, RJ
    Zaidi, J
    Dean, N
    Jacobs, HS
    Tan, SL
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1996, 13 (05) : 401 - 406
  • [38] Ovarian response and follow-up outcomes in women diagnosed with cancer having fertility preservation: Comparison of random start and early follicular phase stimulation - cohort study
    Muteshi, Charles
    Child, Tim
    Ohuma, Eric
    Fatum, Muhammad
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 230 : 10 - 14
  • [39] Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
    Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
    Kan, Andrew
    Leung, Peter
    Lee, Vivian C. Y.
    Li, Raymond H. W.
    Ledger, William
    Ng, Ernest H. Y.
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [40] Random start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation during incidental pregnancy: a case report of blastocyst vitrification from in vitro matured oocytes
    Sukura, Yavuz Emre
    Ozkavukcu, Sinan
    Ilhan, Fatma Ceylan
    Simsir, Coskun
    Sonmezer, Murat
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (07) : 564 - 566