EVALUATION OF CLOUD TYPE CLASSIFICATION BASED ON SPLIT WINDOW ALGORITHM USING HIMAWARI-8 SATELLITE DATA

被引:0
作者
Purbantoro, Babag [1 ,2 ]
Aminuddin, Jamrud [1 ,3 ]
Manago, Naohiro [1 ]
Toyoshima, Koichi [1 ]
Lagrosas, Nofel [1 ]
Sumantyo, Josaphat Tetuko Sri [1 ]
Kuze, Hiroaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Ctr Environm Remote Sensing, Chiba, Japan
[2] Indonesian Inst Aeronaut & Space LAPAN, Remote Sensing Technol & Data Ctr, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Jenderal Soedirman, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Dept Phys, Purwokerto, Indonesia
来源
2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019) | 2019年
关键词
Himawari-8; split window algorithm; brightness temperature; cloud type classification; machine learning;
D O I
10.1109/igarss.2019.8898451
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Precise evaluation of cloud types is indispensable for the detailed analysis of the Earth's radiation budget. The split window algorithm (SWA) is an algorithm that has been widely employed for cloud type classification from meteorological satellite imagery. In this study, we apply the SWA to analyze the clouds that appear in the Japan area using the imagery of Himawari-8 meteorological satellite. The brightness temperature (BT) information from band 13 (BT13, 10 mu m) and band 15 (BT15, 12 mu m) are employed with the BT difference (BTD) between these two bands (BTD13-15). For daytime analysis, the albedo of band 1 (0.47 mu m) is also used to discriminate the cloudy and cloud-free areas. The validation of the resulting cloud type (SWA13-15), which includes ten classes including cloud-free condition, is carried out using the space-borne lidar data concurrent with the satellite observations. In addition, two different classifiers, namely, the sequential minimal optimization (SMO) and Naive Bayes (NB) classifiers are tested with the results of SWA. When about 10% of 2 million data points are used for training the classifiers, the test results reveal that the correctly classified points are 97.0% and 89.5% for the first dataset (observed in July 2015) and 97.4%, and 92.1% for the second dataset (July 2016) for SMO and NB, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 173
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] An Introduction to Himawari-8/9-Japan's New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological Satellites
    Bessho, Kotaro
    Date, Kenji
    Hayashi, Masahiro
    Ikeda, Akio
    Imai, Takahito
    Inoue, Hidekazu
    Kumagai, Yukihiro
    Miyakawa, Takuya
    Murata, Hidehiko
    Ohno, Tomoo
    Okuyama, Arata
    Oyama, Ryo
    Sasaki, Yukio
    Shimazu, Yoshio
    Shimoji, Kazuki
    Sumida, Yasuhiko
    Suzuki, Masuo
    Taniguchi, Hidetaka
    Tsuchiyama, Hiroaki
    Uesawa, Daisaku
    Yokota, Hironobu
    Yoshida, Ryo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2016, 94 (02) : 151 - 183
  • [2] Ready-to-Use Methods for the Detection of Clouds, Cirrus, Snow, Shadow, Water and Clear Sky Pixels in Sentinel-2 MSI Images
    Hollstein, Andre
    Segl, Karl
    Guanter, Luis
    Brell, Maximilian
    Enesco, Marta
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (08)
  • [4] Radiative effects of various cloud types as classified by the split window technique over the eastern sub-tropical pacific derived from collocated ERBE and AVHRR data
    Inoue, T
    Ackerman, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2002, 80 (06) : 1383 - 1394
  • [5] Evaluating and improving cloud phase in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 using spaceborne lidar observations
    Kay, Jennifer E.
    Bourdages, Line
    Miller, Nathaniel B.
    Morrison, Ariel
    Yettella, Vineel
    Chepfer, Helene
    Eaton, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (08) : 4162 - 4176
  • [6] Comparison of a split-window and a multi-spectral cloud classification for MODIS observations
    Lutz, HJ
    Inoue, T
    Schmetz, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2003, 81 (03) : 623 - 631
  • [7] Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms
    Otukei, J. R.
    Blaschke, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2010, 12 : S27 - S31
  • [8] Patil T.R., 2013, International journal of computer science and applications, V6, P256
  • [9] Platt JC, 1999, ADVANCES IN KERNEL METHODS, P185
  • [10] Purbantoro B., 2018, Advances in Remote Sensing, 07, DOI DOI 10.4236/ARS.2018.73015