Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:3
|
作者
Bernie, Aaron M. [1 ]
Caire, Arthur A. [1 ]
Conley, Sarah P. [1 ]
Oommen, Mathew [1 ]
Boylu, Ugur [1 ]
Thomas, Raju [1 ]
Lee, Benjamin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
Robotics; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Anastomosis; Surgical; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; RESTORATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4293/108680810X12924466008204
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Our goal was to evaluate posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and determine whether this technique decreased anastomotic time of a surgeon in training to perform vesicourethral reconstruction. Methods: We reviewed the first 25 robot-assisted prostatectomies performed by 2 urology surgeons in training (surgeon 1 and surgeon 2). The patient populations were matched for age, Gleason score, clinical stage, and PSA. Whereas surgeon 1 performed the vesicourethral anastomosis without posterior reconstruction, surgeon 2 reapproximated Denonvilliers' fascia of the posterior bladder to the rhabdosphincter. Time for each surgeon to complete the anastomosis and clinical factors was compared. Results: Surgeon 1 had a median anastomosis time of 25 minutes (range, 17 to 48), whereas surgeon 2 had a median anastomosis time of 15 minutes (range, 10 to 30) (P < 0.001). Biopsy Gleason score, pathological tumor stage, perineural invasion, median age at the time of surgery, PSA, prostate weight, and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between surgeons (P > 0.05). Pathological Gleason score (P=0.045) and total console time (surgeon 1=216 minutes, surgeon 2=176 minutes; P=0.002) were significantly different between surgeons. Conclusion: Posterior reconstruction prior to anastomosis decreases anastomosis time for robotic surgeons in training.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 524
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Patel, Vipul R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [42] The Efficacy of Urinary Continence in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bladder-Prostatic Muscle Reconstruction and Bladder Neck Eversion Anastomosis
    Luan, Yang
    Ding, Xue-Fei
    Lu, Sheng-Ming
    Huang, Tian-Bao
    Chen, Ji
    Xiao, Qin
    Wang, Li-Ping
    Chen, Hao-Peng
    Han, Yue-Xing
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (12):
  • [43] The efficacy of STRATAFIX® spiral PDS for vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-center retrospective study
    Tsuboi, Ichiro
    Ogawa, Kohei
    Tanaka, Gen
    Mitani, Kazutaka
    Yoshioka, Saori
    Yokoyama, Shuhei
    Nakajima, Hirochika
    Nagami, Taichi
    Wada, Koichiro
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 56 (01) : 137 - 142
  • [44] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Sun, Maxine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (20) : 2767 - 2773
  • [45] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Seo, Hyun Ju
    Lee, Na Rae
    Son, Soo Kyung
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Rha, Koon Ho
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2017, 58 (03) : 152 - 163
  • [46] Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Manfredi, Matteo
    De Luca, Stefano
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Morra, Ivano
    Passera, Roberto
    Fiori, Cristian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 485 - 495
  • [47] Nerve Sparing during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Increases the Risk of Ipsilateral Positive Surgical Margins
    Soeterik, T. F. W.
    van Melick, H. H. E.
    Dijksman, L. M.
    Stomps, S.
    Witjes, J. A.
    van Basten, J. P. A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [48] Optimizing Vesicourethral Anastomosis Healing After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Lessons Learned from Three Techniques in 1900 Patients
    Tan, Gerald
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Grover, Sonal
    Peters, David
    Dorsey, Philip, Jr.
    Scott, Ann
    Jhaveri, Jay
    Tilki, Derya
    Te, Alexis
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (12) : 1975 - 1983
  • [49] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Artibani, Walter
    Cestari, Andrea
    Galfano, Antonio
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Menon, Mani
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Patel, Vipul
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) : 1037 - 1063
  • [50] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291