Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:3
作者
Bernie, Aaron M. [1 ]
Caire, Arthur A. [1 ]
Conley, Sarah P. [1 ]
Oommen, Mathew [1 ]
Boylu, Ugur [1 ]
Thomas, Raju [1 ]
Lee, Benjamin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
Robotics; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Anastomosis; Surgical; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; RESTORATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4293/108680810X12924466008204
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Our goal was to evaluate posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and determine whether this technique decreased anastomotic time of a surgeon in training to perform vesicourethral reconstruction. Methods: We reviewed the first 25 robot-assisted prostatectomies performed by 2 urology surgeons in training (surgeon 1 and surgeon 2). The patient populations were matched for age, Gleason score, clinical stage, and PSA. Whereas surgeon 1 performed the vesicourethral anastomosis without posterior reconstruction, surgeon 2 reapproximated Denonvilliers' fascia of the posterior bladder to the rhabdosphincter. Time for each surgeon to complete the anastomosis and clinical factors was compared. Results: Surgeon 1 had a median anastomosis time of 25 minutes (range, 17 to 48), whereas surgeon 2 had a median anastomosis time of 15 minutes (range, 10 to 30) (P < 0.001). Biopsy Gleason score, pathological tumor stage, perineural invasion, median age at the time of surgery, PSA, prostate weight, and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between surgeons (P > 0.05). Pathological Gleason score (P=0.045) and total console time (surgeon 1=216 minutes, surgeon 2=176 minutes; P=0.002) were significantly different between surgeons. Conclusion: Posterior reconstruction prior to anastomosis decreases anastomosis time for robotic surgeons in training.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 524
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Robotic radical prostatectomy: A technique to reduce pT2 positive margins [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Eichel, L ;
Edwards, RA ;
Lee, DI ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (06) :1224-1228
[2]   Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Artibani, Walter ;
Fracalanza, Simonetta ;
Cavalleri, Stefano ;
Iafrate, Massimo ;
Aragona, Maurizio ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Gardiman, Marina ;
Ficarra, Vincenzo .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2008, 80 (03) :237-244
[3]   Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes [J].
Atug, F ;
Castle, EP ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Burgess, SV ;
Thomas, R ;
Davis, R .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :866-872
[4]   Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy - Assessment after 2766 procedures [J].
Badani, Ketan K. ;
Kaul, Sanjeev ;
Menon, Mani .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (09) :1951-1958
[5]   Robotic prostatectomy: A review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches [J].
Berryhill, Roy, Jr. ;
Jhaveri, Jay ;
Yadav, Rajiv ;
Leung, Robert ;
Rao, Sandhya ;
El-Hakim, Assaad ;
Tewari, Ashutosh .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (01) :15-23
[6]  
MENNO M, 2005, UROLOGY, V66, P101
[7]   Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy [J].
Nguyen, Mike M. ;
Kamoi, Kazumi ;
Stein, Robert J. ;
Aron, Monish ;
Hafron, Jason M. ;
Turna, Burak ;
Myers, Robert P. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (09) :1135-1139
[8]   Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy [J].
Parsons, J. Kellogg ;
Bennett, J. Lisette .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (02) :412-416
[9]  
Raman Jay D, 2007, JSLS, V11, P1
[10]   Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Rocco, F. ;
Carmignani, L. ;
Acquati, P. ;
Gadda, F. ;
Dell'Orto, P. ;
Rocco, B. ;
Bozzini, G. ;
Gazzano, G. ;
Morabito, A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (06) :2201-2206