Use of Objective Metrics in Dynamic Facial Reanimation A Systematic Review

被引:13
作者
Revenaugh, Peter C. [1 ]
Smith, Ryan M. [1 ]
Plitt, Max A. [1 ]
Ishii, Lisa [2 ]
Boahene, Kofi [2 ]
Byrne, Patrick J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1611 W Harrison St,Ste 550, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
GRACILIS MUSCLE TRANSFER; CROSS-FACE NERVE; CLIMA EVALUATING SYSTEM; MASSETER MOTOR-NERVE; SMILE RECONSTRUCTION; PARALYZED FACE; TEMPORALIS TENDON; FASCIA LATA; PALSY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0398
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Facial nerve deficits cause significant functional and social consequences for those affected. Existing techniques for dynamic restoration of facial nerve function are imperfect and result in a wide variety of outcomes. Currently, there is no standard objective instrument for facial movement as it relates to restorative techniques. OBJECTIVE To determine what objective instruments of midface movement are used in outcome measurements for patients treated with dynamic methods for facial paralysis. DATA SOURCES Database searches from January 1970 to June 2017 were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Only English-language articles on studies performed in humans were considered. The search terms used were ("Surgical Flaps"[Mesh] OR "Nerve Transfer"[Mesh] OR "nerve graft" OR "nerve grafts") AND (face [mh] OR facial paralysis [mh]) AND (innervation [sh]) OR ("FacelMesh] OR facial paralysis [mh]) AND (reanimation [tiab]). STUDY SELECTION Two independent reviewers evaluated the titles and abstracts of all articles and included those that reported objective outcomes of a surgical technique in at least 2 patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The presence or absence of an objective instrument for evaluating outcomes of midface reanimation. Additional outcome measures were reproducibility of the test, reporting of symmetry, measurement of multiple variables, and test validity. RESULTS Of 241 articles describing dynamic facial reanimation techniques, 49 (20.3%) reported objective outcome measures for 1898 patients. Of those articles reporting objective measures, there were 29 different instruments, only 3 of which reported all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although instruments are available to objectively measure facial movement after reanimation techniques, most studies do not report objective outcomes. Of objective facial reanimation instruments, few are reproducible and able to measure symmetry and multiple data points. To accurately compare objective outcomes in facial reanimation, a reproducible, objective, and universally applied instrument is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 508
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Standardizing Domains and Metrics of Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review
    Akkara, Yash
    Afreen, Ryan
    Lemonick, Michael
    Paz, Santiago Gomez
    Rifi, Ziad
    Tosto, Jenna
    Putrino, David
    Mocco, J.
    Bederson, Joshua
    Dangayach, Neha
    Kellner, Christopher P.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (12)
  • [32] Physical Therapy for Iatrogenic Facial Paralysis A Systematic Review
    Wamkpah, Nneoma S.
    Jeanpierre, Latoya
    Lieu, Judith E. C.
    Del Toro, Drew
    Simon, Laura E.
    Chi, John J.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (11) : 1065 - 1072
  • [33] Recipient Selection Criteria for Facial Transplantation A Systematic Review
    Parker, Augustus
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Rodriguez-Colon, Ricardo
    Hao, Yvonne
    Kurian, Keerthi
    Trilles, Jorge
    Boczar, Daniel
    Brydges, Hilliard
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 89 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [34] Physical therapy for idiopathic facial paralysis: A systematic review
    Varelas, Eleni A.
    Gidumal, Sunder
    Verma, Hannah
    Vujovic, Dragan
    Rosenberg, Joshua D.
    Gray, Mingyang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 46 (01)
  • [35] Metrics for quantifying antibiotic use in the hospital setting: results from a systematic review and international multidisciplinary consensus procedure
    Benic, Mirjana Stanic
    Milanic, Romina
    Monnier, Annelie A.
    Gyssens, Inge C.
    Adriaenssens, Niels
    Versporten, Ann
    Zanichelli, Veronica
    Le Marechal, Marion
    Huttner, Benedikt
    Tebano, Gianpiero
    Hulscher, Marlies E.
    Pulcini, Celine
    Schouten, Jeroen
    Vlahovic-Palcevski, Vera
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 73 : 50 - 58
  • [36] Objective sleep outcomes in randomized-controlled trials in persons with substance use disorders: A systematic review
    Huhn, Andrew S.
    Dunn, Kelly E.
    Ellis, Jennifer D.
    Sholler, Dennis J.
    Tabaschek, Paula
    Burns, Rachel
    Strain, Eric C.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2022, 237
  • [37] Facial nerve reconstruction for flaccid facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zumbusch, Friedemann
    Schlattmann, Peter
    Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [38] Quality of life after surgical treatments for facial palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van der Lely, Johannes N.
    Nieuwdorp, Niek J.
    Smits, Ineke C. A. W.
    van Zijl, Floris V. W. J.
    Corten, Eveline M. L.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, 46 (10): : 2582 - 2590
  • [39] Measurements of motor functional outcomes in facial transplantation: A systematic review
    Boczar, Daniel
    Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez
    Berman, Zoe P.
    Diep, Gustave K.
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Trilles, Jorge
    Gelb, Bruce E.
    Ceradini, Daniel J.
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (09) : 3309 - 3321
  • [40] Facial paralysis after intraoral anesthetic injection: A systematic review
    Ferrer-Valdivia, Nicolas
    Fernandez-Cordova, Melissa
    Herrera-Barraza, Victor
    Araya, Jorge
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2022, 59 (04) : 617 - 627