Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality

被引:30
作者
Eddon, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
SUPERVENIENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00414.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The standard counterexamples to David Lewis's account of intrinsicality involve two sorts of properties: identity properties and necessary properties. Proponents of the account have attempted to deflect these counterexamples in a number of ways. This paper argues that none of these moves are legitimate. Furthermore, this paper argues that no account along the lines of Lewis's can succeed, for an adequate account of intrinsicality must be sensitive to hyperintensional distinctions among properties.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 336
页数:23
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SYNTHESE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, LEWIS EDWIN HAHN 199
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, CONSCIOUSNESS CONT S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, PHILOS PAP
[5]  
Bricker Phillip., 2007, CONT DEBATES METAPHY
[6]   RELEVANT PREDICATION .2. INTRINSIC-PROPERTIES AND INTERNAL RELATIONS [J].
DUNN, JM .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1990, 60 (03) :177-206
[7]  
Fine Kit., 1994, Philosophical Perspectives, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/2214160
[8]   How to define intrinsic properties [J].
Francescotti, R .
NOUS, 1999, 33 (04) :590-609
[9]  
Hall Ned., 2004, CAUSATION COUNTERFAC, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/1752.003.0010
[10]   Intrinsic properties and natural relations [J].
Hawthorne, J .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 63 (02) :399-403