How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries

被引:9
作者
Lingervelder, Deon [1 ]
Koffijberg, Hendrik [1 ]
Emery, Jon D. [2 ]
Fennessy, Paul [3 ]
Price, Christopher P. [4 ]
van Marwijk, Harm [5 ]
Eide, Torunn B. [6 ]
Sandberg, Sverre [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Cals, Jochen W. L. [10 ]
Derksen, Joke T. M. [11 ]
Kusters, Ron [1 ,12 ]
IJzerman, Maarten J. [1 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Tech Med Ctr, Hlth Technol & Serv Res Dept, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Canc Res, Dept Gen Practice, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] State Govt Victoria, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Sussex, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Falmer, England
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Dept Gen Practice, Oslo, Norway
[7] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Norwegian Org Qual Improvement Lab Examinat NOKL, Bergen, Norway
[8] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[9] Haukeland Hosp, Norwegian Porphyria Ctr, Dept Med Biochem & Pharmacol, Bergen, Norway
[10] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Family Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[11] Zorginstituut Nederland, Sector Zorg, Diemen, Netherlands
[12] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Lab Clin Chem & Haematol, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[13] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Canc Hlth Serv Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Primary Healthcare; General Practice; Value Network; Rapid Diagnostics; Organization of Care; IMPLEMENTATION; HEMOGLOBIN; CLINICS;
D O I
10.34172/ijhpm.2021.143
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations. Methods: The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country. Results: The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for general practitioners (GPs) aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support. Conclusion: Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:2248 / 2260
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2016, AUSTR HLTH SER, V15, P1
  • [2] Boyd M., 2016, Surgery, V34, P91, DOI [10.1016/j.mpsur.2015.11.004, DOI 10.1016/J.MPSUR.2015.11.004]
  • [3] Castle-Clarke S., 2017, Falling short: why the NHS is still struggling to make the most of new innovations
  • [4] Challen Laura, 2015, Hosp Pharm, V50, P783, DOI 10.1310/hpj5009-783
  • [5] Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), 2018, QUALITY STANDARDS IN, P1
  • [6] Nasty or Nice? A Perspective on the Use of Health Technology Assessment in the United Kingdom
    Drummond, Michael
    Sorenson, Corinna
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 : S8 - S13
  • [7] Does use of point-of-care testing improve cost-effectiveness of the NHS Health Check programme in the primary care setting? A cost-minimisation analysis
    El-Osta, Austen
    Woringer, Maria
    Pizzo, Elena
    Verhoef, Talitha
    Dickie, Claire
    Ni, Melody Z.
    Huddy, Jeremy R.
    Soljak, Michael
    Hanna, George B.
    Majeed, Azeem
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [8] Clinical effect and cost-effectiveness of incorporation of point-of-care assays into early infant HIV diagnosis programmes in Zimbabwe: a modelling study
    Frank, Simone C.
    Cohn, Jennifer
    Dunning, Lorna
    Sacks, Emma
    Walensky, Rochelle P.
    Mukherjee, Sushant
    Dugdale, Caitlin M.
    Turunga, Esther
    Freedberg, Kenneth A.
    Ciaranello, Andrea L.
    [J]. LANCET HIV, 2019, 6 (03): : E182 - E190
  • [9] Glover, 2017, AUSTR INT HLTH CARE
  • [10] Challenges of development and implementation of point of care pharmacogenetic testing
    Haga, Susanne B.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 16 (09) : 949 - 960