Survey of automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation techniques on magnetic resonance imaging

被引:76
作者
Danelakis, Antonios [1 ]
Theoharis, Theoharis [1 ]
Verganelakis, Dimitrios A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Sem Saelands Vei 7-9, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Childrens Hosp A Sofia, Nucl Med Dept, Oncol Clin ELP1DA, Goudi, Greece
关键词
Brain MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Automated segmentation; Survey; WHITE-MATTER LESIONS; BRAIN SEGMENTATION; NONLOCAL MEANS; MRI; ATLAS; DIAGNOSIS; ATROPHY; CLASSIFICATION; CONSORTIUM; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.002
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease. It affects the central nervous system and its clinical manifestation can variate. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is often used to detect, characterize and quantify MS lesions in the brain, due to the detailed structural information that it can provide. Manual detection and measurement of MS lesions in MRI data is time-consuming, subjective and prone to errors. Therefore, multiple automated methodologies for MRI-based MS lesion segmentation have been proposed. Here, a review of the state-of-the-art of automatic methods available in the literature is presented. The current survey provides a categorization of the methodologies in existence in terms of their input data handling, their main strategy of segmentation and their type of supervision. The strengths and weaknesses of each category are analyzed and explicitly discussed. The positive and negative aspects of the methods are highlighted, pointing out the future trends and, thus, leading to possible promising directions for future research. In addition, a further clustering of the methods, based on the databases used for their evaluation, is provided. The aforementioned clustering achieves a reliable comparison among methods evaluated on the same databases. Despite the large number of methods that have emerged in the field, there is as yet no commonly accepted methodology that has been established in clinical practice. Future challenges such as the simultaneous exploitation of more sophisticated MRI protocols and the hybridization of the most promising methods are expected to further improve the performance of the segmentation. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 100
页数:18
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]  
Ali S., 2016, Proc. Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, P1, DOI DOI 10.4271/2016-01-0285
[2]   Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy [J].
Aljabar, P. ;
Heckemann, R. A. ;
Hammers, A. ;
Hajnal, J. V. ;
Rueckert, D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 46 (03) :726-738
[3]   DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-2 - PREDICTIVE VALUES .4. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) :102-102
[4]   Automated Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions Using Multi-dimensional Gated Recurrent Units [J].
Andermatt, Simon ;
Pezold, Simon ;
Cattin, Philippe C. .
BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES, BRAINLES 2017, 2018, 10670 :31-42
[5]   Multi-dimensional Gated Recurrent Units for the Segmentation of Biomedical 3D-Data [J].
Andermatt, Simon ;
Pezold, Simon ;
Cattin, Philippe .
DEEP LEARNING AND DATA LABELING FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 10008 :142-151
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 14 EUR SIGN PROC C
[7]  
[Anonymous], IEEE INTERNET THINGS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Atlas multiple sclerosis resources in the world
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MIDAS J
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MSSEG CHALL P MULT S