Detection and Classification of Calcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison

被引:207
作者
Spangler, M. Lee [1 ]
Zuley, Margarita L. [2 ]
Sumkin, Jules H. [2 ]
Abrams, Gordan [2 ]
Ganott, Marie A. [2 ]
Hakim, Christiane [2 ]
Perrin, Ronald [2 ]
Chough, Denise M. [2 ]
Shah, Ratan [2 ]
Gur, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
calcifications; digital breast tomosynthesis; digital mammography; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; OBSERVER; RISK;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.4656
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare the ability of digital breast tomosynthesis and full field digital mammography (FFDM) to detect and characterize calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred paired examinations were performed utilizing FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis. Twenty biopsy-proven cancers, 40 biopsy-proven benign calcifications, and 40 randomly selected negative screening studies were retrospectively reviewed by five radiologists in a crossed multireader multimodal observer performance study. Data collected included the presence of calcifications and forced BI-RADS scores. Receiver operator curve analysis using BI-RADS was performed. RESULTS. Overall calcification detection sensitivity was higher for FFDM (0.84% [95% CI, 0.79-0.88%]) than for digital breast tomosynthesis (0.75% [95% CI, 0.70-0.80%]). In the cancer cohort, 75 (76%) of 99 interpretations identified calcification in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score less than or equal to 2 was rendered in three (4%) and nine (12%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. In the benign cohort, 123 (62%) of 200 interpretations identified calcifications in both modes. Of those, a BI-RADS score greater than or equal to 3 was assigned in 105 (85%) and 93 (76%) cases with FFDM and digital breast tomosynthesis, respectively. There was no significant difference in the nonparametric computed area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) using the BI-RADS scores (FFDM, AUC = 0.76 and SD = 0.03; digital breast tomosynthesis, AUC = 0.72 and SD = 0.04 [p = 0.1277]). CONCLUSION. In this small data set, FFDM appears to be slightly more sensitive than digital breast tomosynthesis for the detection of calcification. However, diagnostic performance as measured by area under the curve using BI-RADS was not significantly different. With improvements in processing algorithms and display, digital breast tomosynthesis could potentially be improved for this purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 324
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification [J].
Petrillo, Antonella ;
Fusco, Roberta ;
Vallone, Paolo ;
Filice, Salvatore ;
Granata, Vincenza ;
Petrosino, Teresa ;
Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria ;
Setola, Sergio Venanzio ;
Raso, Mauro Mattace ;
Maio, Francesca ;
Raiano, Concetta ;
Siani, Claudio ;
Di Bonito, Maurizio ;
Botti, Gerardo .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05) :860-872
[22]   A comparison of image interpretation times in Full Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis [J].
Astley, Susan ;
Connor, Sophie ;
Lim, Yit ;
Tate, Catriona ;
Entwistle, Helen ;
Morris, Julie ;
Whiteside, Sigrid ;
Sergeant, Jamie ;
Wilson, Mary ;
Beetles, Ursula ;
Boggis, Caroline ;
Gilbert, Fiona .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2013, 8673
[23]   A Comparative Analysis of 2D and 3D CAD for Calcifications in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis [J].
Acciavatti, Raymond J. ;
Ray, Shonket ;
Keller, Brad M. ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. ;
Conant, Emily F. .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9414
[24]   Accuracy in tumor size measurements: Comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography [J].
Sendur, Halit Nahit ;
Cerit, Mahi Nur ;
Gultekin, Serap ;
Cindil, Emetullah ;
Aslan, Aydan Avdan ;
Erdal, Zeynep Sezgi ;
Gultekin, Isil Imge ;
Teke, Furkan .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 69 :115-119
[25]   BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING? [J].
Svahn, Tony .
MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, :53-56
[26]   Virtual clinical trial of lesion detection in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Bakic, Predrag R. ;
Barufaldi, Bruno ;
Higginbotham, David ;
Weinstein, Susan P. ;
Avanaki, Ali N. ;
Espig, Kathryn S. ;
Xthona, Albert ;
Kimpe, Tom R. L. ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2018, 10573
[27]   The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Hadjipanteli, Andria ;
Elangovan, Premkumar ;
Mackenzie, Alistair ;
Wells, Kevin ;
Dance, David R. ;
Young, Kenneth C. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 57 :25-32
[28]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program [J].
Hofvind, Solveig ;
Hovda, Tone ;
Holen, Asne S. ;
Lee, Christoph I. ;
Albertsen, Judy ;
Bjorndal, Hilde ;
Brandal, Siri H. B. ;
Gullien, Randi ;
Lomo, Jon ;
Park, Daehoon ;
Romundstad, Linda ;
Suhrke, Pal ;
Vigeland, Einar ;
Skaane, Per .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (03) :787-794
[29]   Digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of mass classification using 3D slices and 2D projection views [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Wu, Yi-Ta ;
Sahiner, Berkman ;
Zhang, Yiheng ;
Wei, Jun ;
Moore, Richard H. ;
Kopans, Daniel B. ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Way, Ted .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915
[30]   A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers [J].
Woo Jung Choi ;
Hak Hee Kim ;
Sun Young Lee ;
Eun Young Chae ;
Hee Jung Shin ;
Joo Hee Cha ;
Byung Ho Son ;
Sei Hyun Ahn ;
Young-Wook Choi .
Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 :886-892