Selection and placement of best management practices used to reduce water quality degradation in Lincoln Lake watershed

被引:84
作者
Rodriguez, Hector German [1 ]
Popp, Jennie [1 ]
Maringanti, Chetan [2 ]
Chaubey, Indrajeet [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Agr Econ & Agribusiness, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS; POULTRY LITTER; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; ILLINOIS RIVER; PHOSPHORUS; PERFORMANCE; SEDIMENT; FIELD;
D O I
10.1029/2009WR008549
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An increased loss of agricultural nutrients is a growing concern for water quality in Arkansas. Several studies have shown that best management practices (BMPs) are effective in controlling water pollution. However, those affected with water quality issues need water management plans that take into consideration BMPs selection, placement, and affordability. This study used a nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). This multiobjective algorithm selects and locates BMPs that minimize nutrients pollution cost-effectively by providing trade-off curves (optimal fronts) between pollutant reduction and total net cost increase. The usefulness of this optimization framework was evaluated in the Lincoln Lake watershed. The final NSGA-II optimization model generated a number of near-optimal solutions by selecting from 35 BMPs (combinations of pasture management, buffer zones, and poultry litter application practices). Selection and placement of BMPs were analyzed under various cost solutions. The NSGA-II provides multiple solutions that could fit the water management plan for the watershed. For instance, by implementing all the BMP combinations recommended in the lowest-cost solution, total phosphorous (TP) could be reduced by at least 76% while increasing cost by less than 2% in the entire watershed. This value represents an increase in cost of $5.49 ha(-1) when compared to the baseline. Implementing all the BMP combinations proposed with the medium-and the highest-cost solutions could decrease TP drastically but will increase cost by $ 24,282 (7%) and $ 82,306 (25%), respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The Practical Handbook of Genetic Algorithms. Applications
[2]  
*AR DEP ENV QUAL, 2008, 2008 LIST IMP WAT 30
[3]   Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm [J].
Arabi, Mazdak ;
Govindaraju, Rao S. ;
Hantush, Mohamed M. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2006, 42 (10)
[4]   SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Fohrer, N .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (03) :563-572
[5]   Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms [J].
Bekele, EG ;
Nicklow, JW .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (10) :W10406-1
[6]  
Borah DK, 2006, T ASABE, V49, P967, DOI 10.13031/2013.21742
[7]   Effectiveness of best management practices in improving water quality in a pasture-dominated watershed [J].
Chaubey, I. ;
Chiang, L. ;
Gitau, M. W. ;
Mohamed, S. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2010, 65 (06) :424-437
[8]  
Chaubey I, 1995, T ASAE, V38, P1687, DOI 10.13031/2013.27995
[9]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[10]  
Deb K., 2001, Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms