Does carbon risk matter in firm dividend policy? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in an imputation environment

被引:89
作者
Balachandran, Balasingham [1 ]
Nguyen, Justin Hung [2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Dept Econ & Finance, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Victoria Business Sch, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Dividend policy; Earnings uncertainty; Carbon risk; Imputation tax system; Franked dividend; PAYOUT POLICY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MARKET VALUATION; TAX RATES; INCENTIVES; EMISSIONS; TAXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.09.015
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the role of carbon risk in dividend policy, and how its effect varies between imputation (paying franked dividends) and classical (paying unfranked dividends) tax environments in the unique experimental setting in Australia. We find that the probability of paying dividend and dividend payout ratio is lower for firms in the highest-emitting industries (polluters) relative to non-polluters, subsequent to ratification of the Kyoto Protocol. While the post-Kyoto reduction in the likelihood of paying dividend is not significantly different, the reduction in payout ratio is smaller in the imputation environment than classical tax system, highlighting the significance of imputation tax environment only on the impact of carbon risk on dividend payout rather than decision to pay. We further document that the post-Kyoto reduction in dividend payout of polluters is driven by their relative increase in earnings uncertainty. The evidence suggests a causal influence of carbon risk on firm dividend policy. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 267
页数:19
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] The relations among environmental disclosures environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach
    Al-Tuwaijri, SA
    Christensen, TE
    Hughes, KE
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2004, 29 (5-6) : 447 - 471
  • [2] Investor protection, taxation, and dividends
    Alzahrani, Mohammed
    Lasfer, Meziane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2012, 18 (04) : 745 - 762
  • [3] AMPCapital, 2016, GREENH GAS EM RISK C
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, The Garnaut Climate Change Review 2011, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139107280
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, J FINANC
  • [6] The Global Financial Crisis, Family Control, and Dividend Policy
    Attig, Najah
    Boubakri, Narjess
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 45 (02) : 291 - 313
  • [7] Dividend reductions, the timing of dividend payments and information content
    Balachandran, Balasingham
    Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar
    Theobald, Michael
    Vidanapathirana, Berty
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2012, 18 (05) : 1232 - 1247
  • [8] ESTIMATION AND MARKET VALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES RELATING TO SUPERFUND SITES
    BARTH, ME
    MCNICHOLS, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1994, 32 : 177 - 209
  • [9] Corporate payout, cash retention, and the supply of credit: Evidence from the 2008-2009 credit crisis
    Bliss, Barbara A.
    Cheng, Yingmei
    Denis, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 115 (03) : 521 - 540
  • [10] Payout policy in the 21st century
    Brav, A
    Graham, JR
    Harvey, CR
    Michaely, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (03) : 483 - 527