A single-center analysis of outcomes, risk factors, and new valves in Asian patients treated with early transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continues to expand as an optimal treatment in Western countries; however, Asian countries have been slower to adopt this procedure. This research aimed to explore the outcomes and status of early TAVI performed at a single center in Asia, and provide comparative outcomes of the newly designed Chinese valves. Methods: We enrolled 175 consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVI from September 2012 to January 2018 at Fuwai Hospital (Beijing, China). After a preliminary assessment of age, we included 109 older patients (>= 69 years) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) during the same period. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce potential bias. Cox regression was used to identify the risk factors of a poor prognosis. Results: The TAVI cohort had higher rates of all-cause mortality [11.4% vs. 2.4%, hazard ratio (HR): 4.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47 to 15.57, IPTW-adjusted P=0.009] and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI; 14.6% vs. 1.6%, HR: 9.98, 95% CI: 2.71 to 36.67, IPTW-adjusted P<0.001) at 3 years than the SAVR cohort. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis based on the entire sample, liver disease was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 5.080, 95% CI: 1.067 to 24.174, P=0.041). A smoking history was associated with an increased risk of postoperative heart failure (HF) (HR: 4.902, 95% CI: 1.265 to 18.999, P=0.022). Additionally, age (HR: 1.141, 95% CI: 1.010 to 1.288, P=0.034) and diabetes (HR: 7.301, 95% CI: 2.414 to 22.079, P<0.001) were identified as predictors of postoperative stroke. In the new valve subgroups, the 1-year composite endpoints were 38.2% (Venus A), 35.3% (TaurusOne), 34% (J-Valve), and 28% (VitaFlow) (P=0.857). Conclusions: Not all TAVI procedures had satisfactory outcomes compared with SAVR when initiated. At first, our center faced some challenges in delivering TAVI, and this is probably one of the reasons why the use of TAVI has developed slowly in Asia. Further investigations are needed to explore the underlying factors precluding the rapid expansion of TAVI in Asia.