18F-fluoromethylcholine (FCho), 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the discrimination between high-grade glioma and radiation necrosis in rats: A PET study

被引:27
作者
Bolcaen, Julie [1 ]
Descamps, Benedicte [2 ]
Deblaere, Karel [3 ]
Boterberg, Tom [4 ]
Pharm, Filip De Vos [5 ]
Kalala, Jean-Pierre [6 ]
Van den Broecke, Caroline [7 ]
Decrock, Elke [8 ]
Leybaert, Luc [8 ]
Vanhove, Christian [2 ]
Goethals, Ingeborg [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, IMinds Med IT, MEDISIP, Dept Elect & Informat Syst,Infin lab, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Radiopharm, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ghent, Belgium
[8] Univ Ghent, Dept Basic Med Sci, Physiol Grp, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
F-18-FCho; F-18-FET; F-18-FDG; Glioblastoma; Radiation necrosis; PET; RECURRENT BRAIN-TUMOR; DIFFERENTIATING RECURRENT; C-11-METHIONINE PET; F-18; FDG; DIAGNOSIS; INJURY; GLIOBLASTOMA; F-18-FLUOROCHOLINE; SENSITIVITY; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.07.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Discrimination between (high-grade) brain tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis (RN) remains a diagnostic challenge because both entities have similar imaging characteristics on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Metabolic imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET) could overcome this diagnostic dilemma. In this study, we investigated the potential of 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-18-FDG), O-(2-[F-18]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (F-18-FET), and [F-18]-Fluoromethyl-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium (F-18-fluoromethylcholine, F-18-FCho) PET in discriminating high-grade tumor from RN. Methods: We developed a glioblastoma (GB) rat model by inoculating F98 GB cells into the right frontal region. Induction of RN was achieved by irradiating the right frontal region with 60 Gy using three arcs with a beam aperture of 3 x 3 mm (n = 3). Dynamic PET imaging with F-18-FDG, F-18-FET, and F-18-FCho, as well as F-18-FDG PET at a delayed time interval (240 mm postinjection), was acquired. Results: MRI revealed contrast-enhancing tumors at 15 days after inoculation (n = 4) and contrast-enhancing RN lesions 5-6 months postirradiation (n = 3). On F-18-FDG PET, the mean lesion-to-normal ratio (LNRmean) was significantly higher in GB than in RN (p = 0.034). The difference in the LNRmean between tumors and RN was higher on the late F-18-FDG PET images than on the PET images reconstructed from the last time frame of the dynamic acquisition (this is at a conventional time interval). LNRs obtained from F-18-FCho PET were not significantly different between GB and RN (p = 1.000). On F-18-FET PET, the LNRmean was significantly higher in GB compared to RN (p = 0.034). Conclusions: Unlike F-18-FCho, F-18-FDG and F-18-FET PET were effective in discriminating GB from RN. Interestingly, in the case of F-18-FDG, delayed PET seems particularly useful. Advances in knowledge and implications for patient care: Our results suggest that (delayed) F-18-FDG and F-18-FET PET can be used to discriminate GB (recurrence) from RN. Confirmation of these results in clinical studies is needed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of current imaging modalities [J].
Alexiou, George A. ;
Tsiouris, Spyridon ;
Kyritsis, Athanasios P. ;
Voulgaris, Spyridon ;
Argyropoulou, Maria I. ;
Fotopoulos, Andreas D. .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 95 (01) :1-11
[2]   Glioblastoma Multiforme Overview of Current Treatment and Future Perspectives [J].
Anton, Kevin ;
Baehring, Joachim M. ;
Mayer, Tina .
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 26 (04) :825-+
[3]   Rat brain tumor models in experimental neuro-oncology: the C6, 9L, T9, RG2, F98, BT4C, RT-2 and CNS-1 gliomas [J].
Barth, Rolf F. ;
Kaur, Balveen .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 94 (03) :299-312
[4]  
Bobek-Billewicz B, 2010, FOLIA NEUROPATHOL, V48, P81
[5]   Diagnosis of malignant glioma: role of neuropathology [J].
Brat, Daniel J. ;
Prayson, Richard A. ;
Ryken, Timothy C. ;
Olson, Jeffrey J. .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (03) :287-311
[6]  
Chao ST, 2001, INT J CANCER, V96, P191, DOI 10.1002/ijc.1016.abs
[7]   Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways [J].
Chin, L. ;
Meyerson, M. ;
Aldape, K. ;
Bigner, D. ;
Mikkelsen, T. ;
VandenBerg, S. ;
Kahn, A. ;
Penny, R. ;
Ferguson, M. L. ;
Gerhard, D. S. ;
Getz, G. ;
Brennan, C. ;
Taylor, B. S. ;
Winckler, W. ;
Park, P. ;
Ladanyi, M. ;
Hoadley, K. A. ;
Verhaak, R. G. W. ;
Hayes, D. N. ;
Spellman, Paul T. ;
Absher, D. ;
Weir, B. A. ;
Ding, L. ;
Wheeler, D. ;
Lawrence, M. S. ;
Cibulskis, K. ;
Mardis, E. ;
Zhang, Jinghui ;
Wilson, R. K. ;
Donehower, L. ;
Wheeler, D. A. ;
Purdom, E. ;
Wallis, J. ;
Laird, P. W. ;
Herman, J. G. ;
Schuebel, K. E. ;
Weisenberger, D. J. ;
Baylin, S. B. ;
Schultz, N. ;
Yao, Jun ;
Wiedemeyer, R. ;
Weinstein, J. ;
Sander, C. ;
Gibbs, R. A. ;
Gray, J. ;
Kucherlapati, R. ;
Lander, E. S. ;
Myers, R. M. ;
Perou, C. M. ;
McLendon, Roger .
NATURE, 2008, 455 (7216) :1061-1068
[8]   DIFFERENTIATION OF CEREBRAL RADIATION NECROSIS FROM TUMOR RECURRENCE BY [F-18] FDG AND RB-82 POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
DOYLE, WK ;
BUDINGER, TF ;
VALK, PE ;
LEVIN, VA ;
GUTIN, PH .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (04) :563-570
[9]   Role of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET for Differentiation of Local Recurrent Brain Metastasis from Radiation Necrosis [J].
Galldiks, Norbert ;
Stoffels, Gabriele ;
Filss, Christian P. ;
Piroth, Marc D. ;
Sabel, Michael ;
Ruge, Maximilian I. ;
Herzog, Hans ;
Shah, Nadim J. ;
Fink, Gereon R. ;
Coenen, Heinz H. ;
Langen, Karl-Josef .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (09) :1367-1374
[10]   Fluorescence imaging of blood-brain barrier disruption [J].
Hawkins, BT ;
Egleton, RD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2006, 151 (02) :262-267