Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data

被引:43
|
作者
Chang, Jung Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moon, Woo Kyung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cho, Nariya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Jeong Seon [4 ]
Kim, Seung Ja [5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Clin Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul 151, South Korea
[4] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Hanyang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Boramea Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 151, South Korea
关键词
Automated breast US; hand-held ultrasound; screen US; detection performance; DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN; PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION; MASSES; US; MAMMOGRAPHY; SONOGRAPHY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1258/ar.2010.100179
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Ultrasonography (US) has been used as an important adjunct to mammography (MG), and automated breast US (ABUS) scanners were originally designed to effectively examine the breast in its entirety. Purpose: To retrospectively assess the performance of radiologists in the detection of breast cancers, initially detected by hand-held ultrasound (HHUS), using 3D breast volume data obtained from a commercial ABUS system. Material and Methods: Bilateral whole breast US was performed using ABUS in 61 consecutive women who were scheduled to undergo US-guided needle biopsy due to suspicious breast masses detected during screening HHUS. Fourteen cancers in 13 women and 48 normal breasts of 48 women with benign disease in the contralateral breast were selected. Three radiologists who had not performed the HHUS examinations independently reviewed the 3D ABUS data for any lesions that required recall for further evaluation. Sensitivities and false-positive rates were calculated. Results: The sensitivities of the three readers for cancer detection were 78.6% (11/14), 78.6%, and 57.1% (8/14), respectively, with false-positive rates of 20.8% (10/48), 12.5% (6/48) and 8.3% (4/48). Seven cancers were detected by all three readers, four cancers by two readers, and one cancer by one reader. Two invasive cancers were not detected by any reader. Conclusion: Of HHUS-detected cancers, only 57.1-78.6% were identified with ABUS. A substantial level of experience and training is necessary to improve cancer detection by ABUS.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF AUTOMATED BREAST ULTRASOUND AS A REPLACEMENT FOR A HAND-HELD SECOND-LOOK ULTRASOUND FOR BREAST LESIONS DETECTED INITIALLY ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Chae, Eun Young
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Kim, Hyun Ji
    Yoo, Hyunkyung
    Baek, Seunghee
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Hak Hee
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (12) : 2246 - 2254
  • [2] Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS)
    Chang, Jung Min
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Park, Jeong Seon
    Kim, Seung Ja
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 78 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [3] Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography
    Wang, Zhi Li
    Xw, Jian Hong
    Li, Jun Lai
    Huang, Yan
    Tang, Jie
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (08): : 1287 - 1293
  • [4] Comparison of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts
    Philadelpho, Fernanda
    Gregorio Calas, Maria Julia
    Coutinho Carneiro, Gracy de Almeida
    Silveira, Isabela Cunha
    Ribeiro Vaz, Andreia Brandao
    Coelho Nogueira, Adriana Maria
    Bergmann, Anke
    Proenca Lobo Lopes, Flavia Paiva
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2021, 43 (03): : 190 - 199
  • [5] A Comparison of the Acceptance of Female Subjects Between Mammography, Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Ultrasound
    Gao, Xican
    Liu, Liwen
    Yan, Jingru
    Yang, Shanling
    Shu, Rui
    Ju, Yan
    Zhang, Ge
    Xiao, Yao
    Song, Hongping
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 9 (04) : 768 - 775
  • [6] Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound
    Kuzmiak, Cherie M.
    Ko, Eun Y.
    Tuttle, Laura A.
    Steed, Doreen
    Zeng, Donglin
    Yoon, Sora C.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (07) : 870 - 879
  • [7] Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound
    Choi, Eun Jung
    Choi, Hyemi
    Park, Eun Hae
    Song, Ji Soo
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 99 : 138 - 145
  • [8] Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery
    Depretto, Catherine
    Liguori, Alessandro
    Primolevo, Alessandra
    Di Cosimo, Serena
    Cartia, Francesco
    Ferranti, Claudio
    Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P.
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2021, 107 (02): : 132 - 138
  • [9] Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography
    Golatta, Michael
    Baggs, Christina
    Schweitzer-Martin, Mirjam
    Domschke, Christoph
    Schott, Sarah
    Harcos, Aba
    Scharf, Alexander
    Junkermann, Hans
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Rom, Joachim
    Sohn, Christof
    Heil, Joerg
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (04) : 889 - 895
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of combined use of automated breast volume scanning & hand-held ultrasound for breast lesions
    Liu, Jialin
    Zhou, Yang
    Wu, Jialing
    Li, Peng
    Liang, Xinyu
    Duan, Haonan
    Wu, Xueqing
    Hou, Xiukun
    Li, Xiaofeng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 154 (02) : 347 - 354