Feature extraction using a deep learning algorithm for uncertainty quantification of channelized reservoirs

被引:20
|
作者
Lee, Kyungbook [1 ]
Lim, Jungtek [2 ]
Ahn, Seongin [3 ]
Kim, Jaejun [4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Petr & Marine Res Div, Daejeon 34132, South Korea
[2] SmartMind, Seoul 09333, South Korea
[3] Samsung Heavy Ind, Dept Energy Plant Researching, Seongnam 13486, Gyeonggi, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Energy Syst Engn, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
Stacked autoencoder (SAE); Deep learning; Distance-based clustering (DBC); Uncertainty quantification; Channelized reservoirs; ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER; NEURAL-NETWORK; DYNAMIC DATA; MODEL PARAMETERIZATION; CLUSTERED COVARIANCE; BACK-PROPAGATION; SMOOTHER; INTEGRATION; IMPROVEMENT; DISTANCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.070
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Reservoir models are generated by geostatistics using available static data. However, there is inherent uncertainty in the reservoir models due to limited information. A number of reservoir models with equivalent probabilities are created to quantitatively assess model uncertainty. The easiest way to evaluate the uncertainty is to perform a reservoir simulation for hundreds of reservoir models, but the simulation cost is too high. Recently, distance-based clustering (DBC) has been used as a means of efficient uncertainty assessment. DBC classifies similar reservoir models into the same group. Because models belonging to the same group have similar reservoir performances, simulating a representative model for each group will give a comparable uncertainty range from simulating all models. For DBC to be successful, the definition of distance, which represents nonsimilarity between models, is the key factor. In this research, after the main information from a reservoir model is extracted through a stacked autoencoder (SAE), which is one of deep learning algorithms, the 2-norm of feature vectors for two models is defined as the distance. First, the hyperparameters for SAE are analyzed by sensitivity analysis in order to optimize the feature vector from reservoir facies model. Similar to other artificial neural network algorithms, uncertainty results are sensitive to the number of neurons and the number of hidden layers but are stable for the number of clusters. After SAE-based clustering, only 20 representative models can realize the uncertainty range present in 800 individual initial models. If there are observed dynamic data, the best representative model can be determined by a misfit between the simulated production from the representative models and the observed data. The best model and its 9 closest models in feature space are selected as qualified models from among the entire 800 models. Additional reservoir simulations for the closest models can dramatically improve the uncertainty range of the prior models without inverse algorithms. The 10 qualified models can be utilized for generating pseudostatic data or can be used as initial models for inverse algorithms for further improvement of reservoir characterization.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1022
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model Regeneration Scheme Using a Deep Learning Algorithm for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification of Channel Reservoirs
    Lee, Youjun
    Kang, Byeongcheol
    Kim, Joonyi
    Choe, Jonggeun
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (09):
  • [2] Algorithm Selection Using Deep Learning Without Feature Extraction
    Alissa, Mohamad
    Sim, Kevin
    Hart, Emma
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'19), 2019, : 198 - 206
  • [3] Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Channelized Reservoirs via Reduced Dimensional Parameterization
    Mondal, Anirban
    Wei, Jia
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [4] Enhancing Channelized Feature Interpretability Using Deep Learning Predictive Modeling
    Sahad, Salbiah Mad
    Nian Wei Tan
    Sajid, Muhammad
    Jones, Ernest Austin, Jr.
    Latiff, Abdul Halim Abdul
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (18):
  • [5] Uncertainty quantification of channel reservoirs assisted by cluster analysis and deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
    Kang, Byeongcheol
    Choe, Jonggeun
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 187
  • [6] Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using an Unsupervised Feature Extraction Algorithm Based on Deep Learning
    Xiao, Yawen
    Wu, Jun
    Lin, Zongli
    Zhao, Xiaodong
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 9428 - 9433
  • [7] Uncertainty Quantification in Classifying Complex Geological Facies Using Bayesian Deep Learning
    Hossain, Touhid Mohammad
    Hermana, Maman
    Jaya, Makky Sandra
    Sakai, Hiroshi
    Abdulkadir, Said Jadid
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 113767 - 113777
  • [8] Uncover This Tech Term: Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning
    Faghani, Shahriar
    Gamble, Cooper
    Erickson, Bradley J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 25 (04) : 395 - 398
  • [9] DEEP LEARNING OF PARAMETERIZED EQUATIONS WITH APPLICATIONS TO UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Qin, Tong
    Chen, Zhen
    Jakeman, John D.
    Xiu, Dongbin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2021, 11 (02) : 63 - 82
  • [10] Deep learning uncertainty quantification for clinical text classification
    Peluso, Alina
    Danciu, Ioana
    Yoon, Hong-Jun
    Yusof, Jamaludin Mohd
    Bhattacharya, Tanmoy
    Spannaus, Adam
    Schaefferkoetter, Noah
    Durbin, Eric B.
    Wu, Xiao-Cheng
    Stroup, Antoinette
    Doherty, Jennifer
    Schwartz, Stephen
    Wiggins, Charles
    Coyle, Linda
    Penberthy, Lynne
    Tourassi, Georgia D.
    Gao, Shang
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 149