Systematic mixed-method review of barriers to end-of-life communication in the family context

被引:37
作者
Nagelschmidt, Katharina [1 ]
Leppin, Nico [1 ]
Seifart, Carola [2 ]
Rief, Winfried [1 ]
von Blanckenburg, Pia [1 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
[2] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Med, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
关键词
communication; family management; psychological care; end of life care; ADVANCE CARE; PALLIATIVE CARE; SPOUSAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT COMMUNICATION; FINAL CONVERSATIONS; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; CAREGIVERS; DEATH; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002219
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Communication about the end of life is especially important in the family context, as patients and their families are considered as the care unit in palliative care. Open end-of-life communication can positively affect medical, psychological and relational outcomes during the dying process for patient and family. Regardless of the benefits of end-of-life conversations, many patients and their family caregivers speak little about relevant end-of-life issues. Aim To identify barriers that hinder or influence the discussion of end-of-life issues in the family context. Design A systematic mixed-method review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Data sources A systematic search of PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted and extended with a hand search. Peer-reviewed primary studies reporting on the barriers to or difficulties in end-of-life conversations experienced by terminally ill patients and/or family caregivers were included in this review. Results 18 qualitative and two quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria. The experiences of n=205 patients and n=738 family caregivers were analysed qualitatively; n=293 patients and n=236 caregivers were surveyed in the questionnaire studies. Five overarching categories emerged from the extracted data: emotional, cognitive, communicative, relational and external processes can hinder end-of-life communication within the family. The most frequently reported barriers are emotional and cognitive processes such as protective buffering or belief in positive thinking. Conclusions Research on end-of-life communication barriers in the family context is scarce. Further research should enhance the development of appropriate assessment tools and interventions to support families with the challenges experienced regarding end-of-life conversations.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 263
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Death talk and relief of death-related distress in patients with advanced cancer [J].
An, Ekaterina ;
Wennberg, Erica ;
Nissim, Rinat ;
Lo, Christopher ;
Hales, Sarah ;
Rodin, Gary .
BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (02)
[2]  
[Anonymous], Definition of palliative care
[3]  
Babrow A.S., 1992, COMMUN THEOR, V2, P95, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2885.1992.TB00031.X
[4]  
Babrow AS., 2009, ENCY COMMUNICATION T, P800
[5]   Open Communication Between Caregivers and Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: The Role of Caregivers' Characteristics and Situational Variables [J].
Bachner, Yaacov G. ;
Carmel, Sara .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2009, 24 (06) :524-531
[6]   Social constraints and spousal communication in lung cancer [J].
Badr, Hoda ;
Taylor, Cindy L. Carmack .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 15 (08) :673-683
[7]   Factors Associated with Congruence Between Preferred and Actual Place of Death [J].
Bell, Christina L. ;
Somogyi-Zalud, Emese ;
Masaki, Kamal H. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (03) :591-604
[8]   Family Relationships and Advance Care Planning: Do Supportive and Critical Relations Encourage or Hinder Planning? [J].
Boerner, Kathrin ;
Carr, Deborah ;
Moorman, Sara .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2013, 68 (02) :246-256
[9]  
Booker R, 2018, INT J PALLIAT NURS, V24, P132, DOI 10.12968/ijpn.2018.24.3.132
[10]   Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life [J].
Brighton, Lisa Jane ;
Bristowe, Katherine .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 92 (1090) :466-470