Should FDG-PET scanning be routinely used for patients with an unknown head and neck squamous primary?

被引:15
|
作者
Silva, P.
Hulse, P.
Sykes, A. J.
Carrington, B.
Julyan, P. J.
Homer, J. J.
Hastings, D. L.
Slevin, N. J.
机构
[1] Christie Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[2] Christie Hosp, Dept Radiol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[3] Christie Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
来源
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY | 2007年 / 121卷 / 02期
关键词
neck nodes; unknown squamous carcinoma; neoplasm metastasis; positron emission tomography;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215106003781
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Between I and 2 per cent of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients will reveal no evidence of a primary malignancy. The management of this group poses many problems, including the morbidity associated with wide field irradiation as well as the difficulty in treatment when a primary does emerge. The aim of this study was to assess the use of fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in patients presenting with an unknown head and neck primary and to consider its routine use in such patients. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients into our study over a four year period. They all presented with a histologically proven, metastatic, squamous cell carcinoma of the neck for which no primary could be found despite full clinical, endoscopic and radiological evaluation with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, all the patients underwent imaging using FDG-PET. The images were interpreted by two radiologists experienced in PET imaging. Results: A primary was identified in nine of the 25 patients (42 per cent); however, of these patients, six had false positive results and only three patients were true positives with supportive histology. In the remaining 16 patients, no abnormality was identified on CT, MRI or PET. Of these 16 patients, two eventually displayed a primary carcinoma, the other 14 patients remaining without evidence of any primary. Conclusion: Despite the high number of positive PET scans, the actual true positive rate was 3/9 (33 per cent); conversely, the true negative rate was 14/16 (88 per cent). We conclude from this study that there is a role for FDG-PET in the patient with an unknown head and neck primary, particularly in the context of a negative PET scan.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] American Burkitt's lymphoma of the head and neck - Evaluation with serial FDG-PET
    Chander, S
    Webster, GC
    Zingas, AP
    Zak, IT
    Joyrich, RN
    Zerin, JM
    Bloom, DA
    Littrup, PJ
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (10) : 646 - 648
  • [22] Efficacy of FDG-PET for defining gross tumor volume of head and neck cancer
    Kajitani, Chikae
    Asakawa, Isao
    Uto, Fumiaki
    Katayama, Emiko
    Inoue, Kazuya
    Tamamoto, Tetsuro
    Shirone, Norihisa
    Okamoto, Hideyuki
    Kirita, Tadaaki
    Hasegawa, Masatoshi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (04) : 671 - 678
  • [23] Relation between Histopathology of Head and Neck Cancers and FDG-PET/CT Parameters
    Bilici, Suat
    Gundogan, Cihan
    Sunter, Ahmet Volkan
    Misir, Esra
    YigiT, Ozgur
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01): : 26 - 31
  • [24] Potential place of FDG-PET for the GTV delineation in head and neck and lung cancers
    Geets, X.
    Lee, J. A.
    Castadot, P.
    Bol, A.
    Gregoire, V.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2009, 13 (6-7): : 594 - 599
  • [25] A prospective trial comparing FDG-PET/CT and CT to assess tumor response to cetuximab in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Adkins, Douglas
    Ley, Jessica
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Siegel, Marilyn J.
    Wildes, Tanya M.
    Michel, Loren
    Trinkaus, Kathryn
    Siegel, Barry A.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (06): : 1493 - 1501
  • [26] Early evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response using FDG-PET/CT predicts survival prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Kikuchi, Masahiro
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    Shinohara, Shogo
    Fujiwara, Keizo
    Yamazaki, Hiroshi
    Kanazawa, Yuji
    Kurihara, Risa
    Kishimoto, Ippei
    Harada, Hiroyuki
    Naito, Yasushi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 18 (03) : 402 - 410
  • [27] Distant metastases and synchronous malignancies on FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective study
    Flygare, Lennart
    Al-Ubaedi, Amal
    Ohman, Wilhelm
    Mo, Susanna Jakobson
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (09) : 1196 - 1204
  • [28] Impact of FDG-PET/CT for the Detection of Unknown Primary Tumours in Patients with Cervical Lymph Node Metastases
    Karapolat, Inanc
    Kumanlioglu, Kamil
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND RADIONUCLIDE THERAPY, 2012, 21 (02) : 63 - 68
  • [29] 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the Assessment of the Contralateral Neck in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Kastrinidis, Nikos
    Kuhn, Felix P.
    Hany, Thomas F.
    Ahmad, Nader
    Huber, Gerhard F.
    Haerle, Stephan K.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (05): : 1210 - 1215
  • [30] Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas
    Dequanter, D.
    Shahla, M.
    Aubert, C.
    Deniz, Y.
    Lothaire, P.
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2015, 8 : 2279 - 2283