Should FDG-PET scanning be routinely used for patients with an unknown head and neck squamous primary?

被引:15
|
作者
Silva, P.
Hulse, P.
Sykes, A. J.
Carrington, B.
Julyan, P. J.
Homer, J. J.
Hastings, D. L.
Slevin, N. J.
机构
[1] Christie Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[2] Christie Hosp, Dept Radiol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[3] Christie Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
来源
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY | 2007年 / 121卷 / 02期
关键词
neck nodes; unknown squamous carcinoma; neoplasm metastasis; positron emission tomography;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215106003781
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Between I and 2 per cent of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients will reveal no evidence of a primary malignancy. The management of this group poses many problems, including the morbidity associated with wide field irradiation as well as the difficulty in treatment when a primary does emerge. The aim of this study was to assess the use of fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in patients presenting with an unknown head and neck primary and to consider its routine use in such patients. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients into our study over a four year period. They all presented with a histologically proven, metastatic, squamous cell carcinoma of the neck for which no primary could be found despite full clinical, endoscopic and radiological evaluation with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, all the patients underwent imaging using FDG-PET. The images were interpreted by two radiologists experienced in PET imaging. Results: A primary was identified in nine of the 25 patients (42 per cent); however, of these patients, six had false positive results and only three patients were true positives with supportive histology. In the remaining 16 patients, no abnormality was identified on CT, MRI or PET. Of these 16 patients, two eventually displayed a primary carcinoma, the other 14 patients remaining without evidence of any primary. Conclusion: Despite the high number of positive PET scans, the actual true positive rate was 3/9 (33 per cent); conversely, the true negative rate was 14/16 (88 per cent). We conclude from this study that there is a role for FDG-PET in the patient with an unknown head and neck primary, particularly in the context of a negative PET scan.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] When should FDG-PET be used in the modern management of lymphoma?
    Barrington, Sally Fiona
    Mikhaeel, Nabegh George
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2014, 164 (03) : 315 - 328
  • [12] Role of FDG-PET/CT in staging and follow-up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Mak, D.
    Corry, J.
    Lau, E.
    Rischin, D.
    Hicks, R. J.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 55 (05): : 487 - 499
  • [13] Early Detection of Recurrent Disease by FDG-PET/CT Leads to Management Changes in Patients With Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck
    Kostakoglu, Lale
    Fardanesh, Reza
    Posner, Marshall
    Som, Peter
    Rao, Srikar
    Park, Eunice
    Doucette, John
    Stein, Evan
    Gupta, Vishal
    Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof
    Genden, Eric
    ONCOLOGIST, 2013, 18 (10): : 1108 - 1117
  • [14] Recurrence Detection by Hybrid [18F]FDG-PET in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Sutter, Oliver P.
    Maurer, Alexander
    Stadler, Thomas M.
    Lanzer, Martin
    Huellner, Martin W.
    Broglie, Martina A.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024,
  • [15] Occult Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uvula Detected by F-18 FDG PET/CT in a Case of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck
    Salem, Shahenda
    Patel, Neva H.
    Barwick, Tara
    Al-Nahhas, Adil
    Howard, David J.
    Zerizer, Imene
    Win, Zarni
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (10) : 800 - 801
  • [16] FDG-PET and detection of distant metastases and simultaneous tumors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison with chest radiography and chest CT
    Krabbe, Christiaan A.
    Pruim, Jan
    van der Laan, Bernard F. A. M.
    Rodiger, L. A.
    Roodenburg, Jan L. N.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 45 (03) : 234 - 240
  • [17] FDG-PET staging and importance of lymph node SUV in head and neck cancer
    Kubicek, Gregory J.
    Champ, Collin
    Fogh, Shannon
    Wang, Fen
    Reddy, Eashwer
    Intenzo, Charles
    Dusing, Reginald W.
    Machtay, Mitchell
    HEAD & NECK ONCOLOGY, 2010, 2
  • [18] Potential for truncating the scan length of restaging FDG-PET/CT after chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Huang, Yi-Tung Tom
    Kumar, Aravind S. Ravi
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 33 (05) : 503 - 508
  • [19] FDG PET/CT in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Primary Surgical Resection With or Without Chemoradiation Therapy
    Taghipour, Mehdi
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Wray, Rick
    Agrawal, Nishant
    Richmon, Jeremy
    Kang, Hyunseok
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (05) : 1093 - 1100
  • [20] FDG-PET metabolic tumor parameters for the reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancer
    Velez, Maria A.
    Veruttipong, Darlene
    Wang, Pin-Chieh
    Abemayor, Elliot
    St John, Maie
    TenNapel, Mindi
    Chen, Allen M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (10): : 2345 - 2350