Should FDG-PET scanning be routinely used for patients with an unknown head and neck squamous primary?

被引:15
|
作者
Silva, P.
Hulse, P.
Sykes, A. J.
Carrington, B.
Julyan, P. J.
Homer, J. J.
Hastings, D. L.
Slevin, N. J.
机构
[1] Christie Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[2] Christie Hosp, Dept Radiol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[3] Christie Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
来源
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY | 2007年 / 121卷 / 02期
关键词
neck nodes; unknown squamous carcinoma; neoplasm metastasis; positron emission tomography;
D O I
10.1017/S0022215106003781
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Between I and 2 per cent of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients will reveal no evidence of a primary malignancy. The management of this group poses many problems, including the morbidity associated with wide field irradiation as well as the difficulty in treatment when a primary does emerge. The aim of this study was to assess the use of fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in patients presenting with an unknown head and neck primary and to consider its routine use in such patients. Methods: We enrolled 25 patients into our study over a four year period. They all presented with a histologically proven, metastatic, squamous cell carcinoma of the neck for which no primary could be found despite full clinical, endoscopic and radiological evaluation with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, all the patients underwent imaging using FDG-PET. The images were interpreted by two radiologists experienced in PET imaging. Results: A primary was identified in nine of the 25 patients (42 per cent); however, of these patients, six had false positive results and only three patients were true positives with supportive histology. In the remaining 16 patients, no abnormality was identified on CT, MRI or PET. Of these 16 patients, two eventually displayed a primary carcinoma, the other 14 patients remaining without evidence of any primary. Conclusion: Despite the high number of positive PET scans, the actual true positive rate was 3/9 (33 per cent); conversely, the true negative rate was 14/16 (88 per cent). We conclude from this study that there is a role for FDG-PET in the patient with an unknown head and neck primary, particularly in the context of a negative PET scan.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FDG-PET/CT for detection of the unknown primary head and neck tumor
    Johansen, J.
    Petersen, H.
    Godballe, C.
    Loft, A.
    Grau, C.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 55 (05): : 500 - 508
  • [2] FDG PET/CT for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary of the head and neck
    Liu, Yiyan
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 92 : 46 - 51
  • [3] Comparison of FLT-PET and FDG-PET for Visualization of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers
    Hoshikawa, Hiroshi
    Nishiyama, Yoshihiro
    Kishino, Takehito
    Yamamoto, Yuka
    Haba, Reiji
    Mori, Nozomu
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 13 (01) : 172 - 177
  • [4] FDG-PET/CT in radiation treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Arens, A. I. J.
    Troost, E. G. C.
    Schinagl, D.
    Kaanders, J. H. A. M.
    Oyen, W. J. G.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 55 (05): : 521 - 528
  • [5] FDG-PET/CT in Cancers of the Head and Neck: What is the Definition of Whole Body Scanning?
    Iagaru, Andrei
    Mittra, Erik S.
    Gambhir, Sanjiv Sam
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 13 (02) : 362 - 367
  • [6] Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET/CT for the Identification of Extranodal Extension in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Toya, Ryo
    Saito, Tetsuo
    Matsuyama, Tomohiko
    Kai, Yudai
    Shiraishi, Shinya
    Murakami, Daizo
    Yoshida, Ryoji
    Watakabe, Takahiro
    Sakamoto, Fumi
    Tsuda, Noriko
    Arimura, Hidetaka
    Orita, Yorihisa
    Nakayama, Hideki
    Oya, Natsuo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (04) : 2073 - 2077
  • [7] FDG-PET/CT imaging for preradiotherapy staging of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Schwartz, DL
    Ford, E
    Rajendran, J
    Yueh, B
    Coltrera, MD
    Virgin, J
    Anzai, Y
    Haynor, D
    Lewellyn, B
    Mattes, D
    Meyer, J
    Phillips, M
    Leblanc, M
    Kinahan, P
    Krohn, K
    Eary, J
    Laramore, GE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (01): : 129 - 136
  • [8] Serial FDG-PET on patients with head and neck cancer: Implications for radiation therapy
    Hentschel, Maria
    Appold, Steffen
    Schreiber, Andreas
    Abramyuk, Andrij
    Abolmaali, Nasreddin
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    Baumann, Michael
    Zoephel, Klaus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 85 (09) : 796 - 804
  • [9] Influence of FDG-PET on primary nodal target volume definition for head and neck carcinomas
    van Egmond, Sylvia L.
    Piscaer, Vera
    Janssen, Luuk M.
    Stegeman, Inge
    Hobbelink, Monique G.
    Grolman, Wilko
    Terhaard, Chris H.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (9-10) : 1099 - 1106
  • [10] FDG-PET scanning in managing patients with lymphoma
    Bodet-Milin, C.
    Salaun, P. -Y.
    Crespin, C.
    Vuillez, J. -P.
    Kraeber-Bodere, F.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2009, 33 (08): : 486 - 490