Intra-observer reliability of commonly used outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis

被引:0
作者
Hernandez-Cruz, B [1 ]
Cardiel, MH [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Immunol & Rheumatol, Mexico City 14000, DF, Mexico
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; reliability; clinical measurements;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the reliability of some commonly used outcome measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods We studied 22 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in a clinical trial in a tertiary care center. The study design consisted of a test-retest, in which the same rheumatologist evaluated all of the patients twice, with an interval between evaluations of 90 to 120 minutes. Statistical analysis of the data consisted of calculation of the weighted Kappa (kappa w) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results For the Ritchie articular index, kappa w = 0.83, ICC = 0.49 p < 0.0001; tender joint count, kappa w = 0.82, ICC = 0.49, p < 0.0001; physician 's global assessment, kappa w = 0.79, ICC = 0.48, p < 0.0001; disease activity score, kappa w = 0.79, ICC = 0.49 p < 0.0001; utilities, kappa W = 0.71, ICC = 0.48, p < 0.0001; swollen joint count, kappa w = 0.7, ICC = 0.47 p < 0.0001; patient's global assessment, kappa w = 0.58, ICC = 0.44 p < 0.0001; pain kappa w = 0.45, ICC = 0.41, p < 0.0001. Conclusions The reliability of most of the outcome measures was good. It was higher for those measurements evaluated by a rheumatologist and for the composite indexes. Those requiring patient participation need to be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 462
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Altman D.G., 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, V1st, P403, DOI [10.1002/sim.4780101015, DOI 10.1002/SIM.4780101015]
  • [2] THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    ARNETT, FC
    EDWORTHY, SM
    BLOCH, DA
    MCSHANE, DJ
    FRIES, JF
    COOPER, NS
    HEALEY, LA
    KAPLAN, SR
    LIANG, MH
    LUTHRA, HS
    MEDSGER, TA
    MITCHELL, DM
    NEUSTADT, DH
    PINALS, RS
    SCHALLER, JG
    SHARP, JT
    WILDER, RL
    HUNDER, GG
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03): : 315 - 324
  • [3] MEASUREMENT OF FUNCTIONAL STATUS, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND UTILITY IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    BELL, MJ
    BOMBARDIER, C
    TUGWELL, P
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1990, 33 (04): : 591 - 601
  • [4] COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982): : 1085 - 1087
  • [5] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [6] AN ADDITIONAL BASIC SCIENCE FOR CLINICAL MEDICINE .4. THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLINIMETRICS
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1983, 99 (06) : 843 - 848
  • [7] FLEISS JL, 1991, DESIGN ANAL CLIN EXP, P1
  • [8] THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY 1991 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL STATUS IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
    HOCHBERG, MC
    CHANG, RW
    DWOSH, I
    LINDSEY, S
    PINCUS, T
    WOLFE, F
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1992, 35 (05): : 498 - 502
  • [9] KLINKHOFF A, 1982, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P492
  • [10] CLINICAL BIOSTATISTICS .54. THE BIOSTATISTICS OF CONCORDANCE
    KRAMER, MS
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1981, 29 (01) : 111 - 123