Prostate boundary segmentation from 3D ultrasound images

被引:69
|
作者
Hu, N
Downey, DB
Fenster, A
Ladak, HM
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
[2] John P Robarts Res Inst, Imaging Res Labs, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
[3] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
关键词
segmentation; three-dimensional ultrasound image; initialization; deformation; mesh;
D O I
10.1118/1.1586267
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Segmenting, or outlining the prostate boundary is an important task in the management of patients with prostate cancer. In this paper, an algorithm is described for semiautomatic segmentation of the prostate from 3D ultrasound images. The algorithm uses model-based initialization and mesh refinement using an efficient deformable model. Initialization requires the user to select only six points from which the outline of the prostate is estimated using shape information. The estimated outline is then automatically deformed to better fit the prostate boundary. An editing tool allows the user to edit the boundary in problematic regions and then deform the model again to improve the final results. The algorithm requires less than 1 min on a Pentium III 400 MHz PC. The accuracy of the algorithm was assessed by comparing the algorithm results, obtained from both local and global analysis, to the manual segmentations on six prostates. The local difference was mapped on the surface of the algorithm boundary to produce a visual representation. Global error analysis showed that the average difference between manual and algorithm boundaries was -0.20+/-0.28 mm, the average absolute difference was 1.19+/-0.14 mm, the average maximum difference was 7.01+/-1.04 mm, and the average volume difference was 7.16%+/-3.45%. Variability in manual and algorithm segmentation was also assessed: Visual representations of local variability were generated by mapping variability on the segmentation mesh. The mean variability in manual segmentation was 0.98 mm and in algorithm segmentation was 0.63 min and the differences of about 51.5% of the points comprising the average algorithm boundary are insignificant (Pless than or equal to0.01) to the manual average boundary. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1659
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preliminary Results in Large Bone Segmentation from 3D Freehand Ultrasound
    Fanti, Zian
    Torres, Fabian
    Arambula Cosio, Fernando
    IX INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS, 2013, 8922
  • [32] Software for interactive segmentation of the carotid artery from 3D black blood magnetic resonance images
    Jin, Y
    Ladak, HM
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2004, 75 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [33] Use of Discrete Dynamic Contours for prostate segmentation in 2D ultrasound images
    Diaz, Kristians
    Castaneda, Benjamin
    IV LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2007, BIOENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR LATIN AMERICA HEALTH, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 18 (1,2): : 321 - 324
  • [34] Spatial feature fusion in 3D convolutional autoencoders for lung tumor segmentation from 3D CT images
    Najeeb, Suhail
    Bhuiyan, Mohammed Imamul Hassan
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2022, 78
  • [35] KIDNEY DETECTION AND REAL-TIME SEGMENTATION IN 3D CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IMAGES
    Prevost, Raphael
    Mory, Benoit
    Correas, Jean-Michel
    Cohen, Laurent D.
    Ardon, Roberto
    2012 9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2012, : 1559 - 1562
  • [36] Segmentation and 3D Visualization of Pelvic Bone from CT Scan Images
    Chandar, K. Punnam
    Satyasavithri, T.
    2016 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING (IACC), 2016, : 430 - 433
  • [37] Calibration and segmentation free 3D modelling from images based on GPU
    Shu, Bo
    Qiu, Xianjie
    Wang, Zhaoqi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 38 (1-3) : 185 - 191
  • [38] Automatic segmentation of brain tumor in intraoperative ultrasound images using 3D U-Net
    Carton, Francois-Xavier
    Chabanas, Matthieu
    Munkvold, Bodil K. R.
    Reinertsen, Ingerid
    Noble, Jack H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2021, 11315
  • [39] Segmentation of prostate biopsy needles in transrectal ultrasound images
    Krefting, Dagmar
    Haupt, Barbara
    Tolxdorff, Thomas
    Kempkensteffen, Carsten
    Miller, Kurt
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2007, 6512
  • [40] Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information
    Klein, Stefan
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Lips, Irene M.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Staring, Marius
    Pluim, Josien P. W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (04) : 1407 - 1417