In Vivo Real-Time Intraocular Pressure Variations during LASIK Flap Creation

被引:58
作者
Chaurasia, Shyam S. [2 ]
Gimeno, Federico Luengo [2 ]
Tan, Kim [2 ]
Yu, Shangjuan [2 ]
Tan, Donald T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Beuerman, Roger W. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mehta, Jodhbir S. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Singapore 117595, Singapore
[4] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, SRP Neurosci & Behav Disorders, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Dept Clin Sci, Singapore, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
POSTERIOR SEGMENT COMPLICATIONS; SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; FEMTOSECOND LASER; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; OPTIC NEUROPATHY; CORNEAL FLAPS; MYOPIC EYES; MICROKERATOME; THICKNESS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.10-5228
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To monitor and compare in vivo real-time intraocular pressure (IOP) in rabbit eyes undergoing LASIK flap creation using microkeratome and femtosecond laser. METHODS. Thirteen rabbit eyes in each group underwent LASIK flap creation using a microkeratome and a femtosecond laser. In vivo real-time IOP profile was measured using a 30-gauge needle with an IOP catheter sensor inserted into the anterior chamber from the limbus during surgery. RESULTS. In vivo real-time IOP monitoring was achieved in all cases, showing IOP variations during different phases of LASIK flap creation from docking of the instrument, start of surgery to the end of procedure, and monitoring the post-LASIK stabilization. IOP fluctuations were significantly lower in corneal flaps made with the femtosecond laser than with the microkeratome during globe suction (81.78 +/- 10.55 vs. 122.51 +/- 16.95 mm Hg), cutting (62.25 +/- 3.28 vs. 141.02 +/- 20.46 mm Hg), and suction (41.40 +/- 2.99 vs. 89.30 +/- 12.15). In contrast, femtosecond laser requires double the time (19 +/- 2 vs. 10 +/- 2 seconds for globe suction and 19 +/- 2 vs. 9 +/- 2 seconds for cutting) for completion of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS. The authors describe an accurate and reliable setup to measure and record in vivo real-time changes in IOP measurement from the anterior chamber during laser surgery. Femtosecond laser flap creation exerts less extreme IOP fluctuations with improved chamber stability but requires more procedure time than does microkeratome. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51: 4641-4645) DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5228
引用
收藏
页码:4641 / 4645
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Posterior segment complications after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis [J].
Arevalo, J. Fernando .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 19 (03) :177-184
[2]   Full thickness macular hole after LASIK for the correction of myopia [J].
Arevalo, JF ;
Mendoza, AJ ;
Velez-Vazquez, W ;
Rodriguez, FJ ;
Rodriguez, A ;
Rosales-Meneses, JL ;
Yepez, JB ;
Ramirez, E ;
Dessouki, A ;
Chan, CK ;
Mittra, RA ;
Ramsay, RC ;
Garcia, RA ;
Ruiz-Moreno, JM .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 112 (07) :1207-1212
[3]   Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers [J].
Bailey, Melissa D. ;
Zadnik, Karla .
CORNEA, 2007, 26 (03) :246-254
[4]   Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery [J].
Bashford, KP ;
Shafranov, G ;
Tauber, S ;
Shields, MB .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 50 (03) :245-251
[5]   Experimental observation of intraocular pressure changes during microkeratome suctioning in laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Bissen-Miyajima, H ;
Suzuki, S ;
Ohashi, Y ;
Minami, K .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (03) :590-594
[6]   Visual field defect associated with laser in situ keratomileusis [J].
Bushley, DM ;
Parmley, VC ;
Paglen, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (05) :668-671
[7]   Laser in situ keratomileusis-induced optic neuropathy [J].
Cameron, BD ;
Saffra, NA ;
Strominger, MB .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (04) :660-665
[8]  
CHATERIS DG, 1997, BR J OPHTHALMOL, V81, P759
[9]   Proposed mechanism for retinal tears after LASIK - An experimental model [J].
Flaxel, CJ ;
Choi, YH ;
Sheety, M ;
Oeinck, SC ;
Lee, JY ;
McDonnell, PJ .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (01) :24-27
[10]   Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000-2003 [J].
Hammond, MD ;
Madigan, WP ;
Bower, KS .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 112 (02) :184-190