Stimulus complexity and prospective timing: Clues for a parallel process model of time perception

被引:17
作者
Aubry, Florent [1 ,2 ]
Guillaume, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Mogicato, Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bergeret, Laure [1 ,2 ]
Celsis, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Med Toulouse, INSERM, U825, F-31000 Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Toulouse 3, F-31000 Toulouse, France
[3] Ecole Natl Vet Toulouse, F-31000 Toulouse, France
关键词
prospective timing; stimulus complexity; human subjects; reaction time; perceptual discrimination;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whereas many studies have considered the role of attention in prospective timing, fewer have established relations between movement complexity and prospective timing. The present study aims at assessing to what extent motion complexity interferes with prospective timing and at delineating a neuropsychophysical plausible model. We have thus designed a visual paradigm presenting stimuli in sequential pairs (reference comparison interval). Stimuli are motionless or moving according to different complexities, and stimulus complexities are intermixed within each pair. To prevent a possible attention-sharing effect, no concurrent task was required. Our study suggests that movement complexity is a key component of duration perception, and that the relative judgement of durations depends on spatio-temporal features of stimuli. In particular, it shows that movement complexity can bias subjects' perception and performance, and that subjects detect that comparison intervals are longer than reference before their end. In the discussion, we advocate that the classical internal clock,model cannot easily account for our results. Consequently, we propose a model for time perception, based on a parallel processing between comparison interval perception and the reconstruction of the reference duration. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 74
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   A NEW TEMPORAL ILLUSION OR THE TOE ONCE AGAIN [J].
ALLAN, LG ;
GIBBON, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (02) :227-229
[2]   PERCEPTION OF TIME [J].
ALLAN, LG .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 26 (05) :340-354
[3]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL MONOGRAPHS
[4]   Expectancy, attention, and time [J].
Barnes, R ;
Jones, MR .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 41 (03) :254-311
[5]   REMEMBERED DURATION - EVIDENCE FOR A CONTEXTUAL-CHANGE HYPOTHESIS [J].
BLOCK, RA ;
REED, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1978, 4 (06) :656-665
[6]   TIME, CHANGE, AND MOTION - THE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS MOVEMENT ON TEMPORAL PERCEPTION [J].
BROWN, SW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1995, 57 (01) :105-116
[7]   What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing [J].
Buhusi, CV ;
Meck, WH .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 6 (10) :755-765
[8]   How do we tell time? [J].
Buonomano, DV ;
Karmarkar, UR .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2002, 8 (01) :42-51
[9]   Further argument for the existence of a pacemaker in the human information processing system [J].
Burle, B ;
Bonnet, M .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1997, 97 (02) :129-143
[10]   What's an internal clock for? From temporal information processing to temporal processing of information [J].
Burle, B ;
Bonnet, M .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1999, 45 (1-3) :59-72