Gender diversity management in foreign subsidiaries: A comparative study in Germany and Japan

被引:23
作者
Bader, Anna Katharina [1 ]
Froese, Fabian Jintae [2 ]
Cooke, Fang Lee [3 ]
Schuster, Tassilo [4 ]
机构
[1] Northumbria Univ, 2 Sandyford Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8QH, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Goettingen, Pl Goettinger Sieben 5, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Monash Univ, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[4] Fraunhofer Inst, Nordostpk 93, D-90411 Nurnberg, Germany
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Gender equality; Gender diversity management; Multinational companies; Foreign subsidiaries; Germany; Japan; COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN; HRM PRACTICES; ORGANIZATIONAL ATTRACTIVENESS; MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATIONS; INSTITUTIONAL DUALITY; MNCS; EMPLOYMENT; WOMEN; CONCEPTUALIZATION; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.intman.2021.100921
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Gender (in)equality varies strongly across countries. However, research has not sufficiently addressed how subsidiaries of multinational companies respond to differences in gender equality between home and host countries. Based on interviews with 34 managers, our study explores how subsidiaries experience gender-related challenges in their home and host countries, what kinds of practices they implement to increase gender equality, and which role the headquarters play in the implementation of these practices. We do so by examining the cases of German subsidiaries in Japan and Japanese subsidiaries in Germany, two countries that differ greatly in gender equality. Building on our analysis, we systematically compare how subsidiaries respond to the institutional pressures from their home and host countries and develop a theoretical model that illustrates how gender diversity management in a subsidiary is contingent on the interaction of (1) global integration pressure from the headquarters and (2) the level of gender equality in the home country relative to the host country, linked via different types of collaboration and practice transfer from the headquarters. Theoretical and practical implications of our findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations [J].
Acker, Joan .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 1990, 4 (02) :139-158
[2]   The Impact of Formal and Informal Distance on Gender Equality Approaches: The Case of a British MNC in Saudi Arabia [J].
Alhejji, Hussain ;
Ng, Eddy S. ;
Garavan, Thomas ;
Carbery, Ronan .
THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 60 (02) :147-159
[3]   Retaining a diverse workforce: the impact of gender-focused human resource management [J].
Ali, Muhammad ;
Metz, Isabel ;
Kulik, Carol T. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 25 (04) :580-599
[4]   Functions of Dysfunction: Managing the Dynamics of an Organizational Duality in a Natural Food Cooperative [J].
Ashforth, Blake E. ;
Reingen, Peter H. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2014, 59 (03) :474-516
[5]  
Bartlett C.A., 1987, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V16, P225, DOI [10.5465/AMR.1991.4279037, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1991.4279037]
[6]   Variations of the same? A sectoral analysis of the gender pay gap in Germany and Austria [J].
Bergmann, Nadja ;
Scheele, Alexandra ;
Sorger, Claudia .
GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION, 2019, 26 (05) :668-687
[7]   From a distance and generalizable to up close and grounded: Reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research INTRODUCTION [J].
Birkinshaw, Julian ;
Brannen, Mary Yoko ;
Tung, Rosalie L. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2011, 42 (05) :573-581
[8]  
Bjorkman Ingmar, 2007, Human Resource Management Journal, V17, P320, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00048.x
[9]   Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices:: evidence from a three-country study [J].
Bjorkman, Ingmar ;
Fey, Carl F. ;
Park, Hyeon Jeong .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 38 (03) :430-446
[10]   Similarity, Isomorphism or Duality? Recent Survey Evidence on the Human Resource Management Policies of Multinational Corporations [J].
Brewster, Chris ;
Wood, Geoffrey ;
Brookes, Michael .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 19 (04) :320-342