A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:89
作者
Gavriilidis, Paschalis [1 ]
Roberts, Keith J. [1 ]
Aldrighetti, Luca [2 ]
Sutcliffe, Robert P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trus, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant Su, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
[2] Osped San Raffaele, Div Hepatobiliary Surg, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
来源
EJSO | 2020年 / 46卷 / 07期
关键词
Robotic; Laparoscopic; Open; Hepatectomy; OPEN LIVER RESECTION; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; OPEN COLORECTAL RESECTIONS; SIMULTANEOUS R0 RESECTION; OPEN MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; HEPATIC RESECTION; ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.227
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The evidence of pairwise meta-analysis of Robotic Hepatectomy (RH) vs Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (LH) and RH vs Open Hepatectomy (OH) is inconclusive. Therefore, the aim of this study, was to compare the outcomes of RH, LH and OH by performing a network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in the following databases: Pubmed, Google scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane library. Cost-effectiveness and survival benefits were selected as primary outcomes. Results: The cost was less in OH compared to both minimally invasive procedures, LH demonstrated lower cost compared to RH, but the differences were not statistically significant. Both the RH and LH cohorts demonstrated significantly lower estimated blood loss, reduced major morbidity rate and shorter length of stay compared to OH cohort. The LH and OH cohorts demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and duration of clamping compared to the RH cohort. The LH cohort included significantly smaller tumours compared to the OH cohort. Conclusion: The present network meta-analysis, demonstrated that both RH and LH in malignant and benign conditions were associated with lower morbidity rates, shorter hospital stay and the procedure related costs were statistically nonsignificant between RH, LH and OH. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1214 / 1224
页数:11
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery From Indication to Implementation [J].
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Aldrighetti, Luca ;
Dagher, Ibrahim ;
Edwin, Bjorn ;
Troisi, Roberto Ivan ;
Alikhanov, Ruslan ;
Aroori, Somaiah ;
Belli, Giulio ;
Besselink, Marc ;
Briceno, Javier ;
Gayet, Brice ;
D'Hondt, Mathieu ;
Lesurtel, Mickael ;
Menon, Krishna ;
Lodge, Peter ;
Rotellar, Fernando ;
Santoyo, Julio ;
Scatton, Olivier ;
Soubrane, Olivier ;
Sutcliffe, Robert ;
Van Dam, Ronald ;
White, Steve ;
Halls, Mark Christopher ;
Cipriani, Federica ;
Van der Poel, Marcel ;
Ciria, Ruben ;
Barkhatov, Leonid ;
Gomez-Luque, Yrene ;
Ocana-Garcia, Sira ;
Cook, Andrew ;
Buell, Joseph ;
Clavien, Pierre-Alain ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Fusai, Giuseppe ;
Geller, David ;
Lang, Hauke ;
Primrose, John ;
Taylor, Mark ;
Van Gulik, Thomas ;
Wakabayashi, Go ;
Asbun, Horacio ;
Cherqui, Daniel .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (01) :11-18
[2]   Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Ades, AE ;
Sculpher, M ;
Sutton, A ;
Abrams, K ;
Cooper, N ;
Welton, N ;
Lu, GB .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (01) :1-19
[3]   A Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Comparative Study of Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Ahn, Keun Soo ;
Kang, Koo Jeong ;
Kim, Yong Hoon ;
Kim, Tae-Seok ;
Lim, Tae Jin .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (12) :872-877
[4]   Early and Long-term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases A Propensity Score-based Analysis [J].
Allard, Marc-Antoine ;
Cunha, Antonio Sa ;
Gayet, Brice ;
Adam, Rene ;
Goere, Diane ;
Bachellier, Philippe ;
Azoulay, Daniel ;
Ayav, Ahmet ;
Navarro, Francis ;
Pessaux, Patrick .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (05) :794-802
[5]  
[Anonymous], METAANALYSIS UPDATED
[6]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[7]   Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results [J].
Belli, G. ;
Fantini, C. ;
D'Agostino, A. ;
Cioffi, L. ;
Langella, S. ;
Russolillo, N. ;
Belli, A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (11) :2004-2011
[8]   Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study [J].
Beppu, Toru ;
Wakabayashi, Go ;
Hasegawa, Kiyoshi ;
Gotohda, Naoto ;
Mizuguchi, Toru ;
Takahashi, Yutaka ;
Hirokawa, Fumitoshi ;
Taniai, Nobuhiko ;
Watanabe, Manabu ;
Katou, Masato ;
Nagano, Hiroaki ;
Honda, Goro ;
Baba, Hideo ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Konishi, Masaru ;
Hirata, Koichi ;
Yamamoto, Masakazu ;
Uchiyama, Kazuhisa ;
Uchida, Eiji ;
Kusachi, Shinya ;
Kubota, Keiichi ;
Mori, Masaki ;
Takahashi, Keiichi ;
Kikuchi, Ken ;
Miyata, Hiroaki ;
Takahara, Takeshi ;
Nakamura, Masafumi ;
Kaneko, Hironori ;
Yamaue, Hiroki ;
Miyazaki, Masaru ;
Takada, Tadahiro .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2015, 22 (10) :711-720
[9]   Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours [J].
Berber, Eren ;
Akyildiz, Hizir Yakup ;
Aucejo, Federico ;
Gunasekaran, Ganesh ;
Chalikonda, Sricharan ;
Fung, John .
HPB, 2010, 12 (08) :583-586
[10]   Perioperative Risk Assessment in Robotic General Surgery Lessons Learned From 884 Cases at a Single Institution [J].
Buchs, Nicolas C. ;
Addeo, Pietro ;
Bianco, Francesco M. ;
Gorodner, Veronica ;
Ayloo, Subhashini M. ;
Elli, Enrique F. ;
Oberholzer, Jose ;
Benedetti, Enrico ;
Giulianotti, Pier C. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (08) :701-708