Maximum handgrip strength as a function of type of work and hand-forearm dimensions

被引:25
作者
Rostamzadeh, Sajjad [1 ]
Saremi, Mahnaz [2 ,3 ]
Fereshteh, Taheri [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Occupat Hlth Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Workplace Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Safety, Tehran, Iran
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2020年 / 65卷 / 03期
关键词
Anthropometric factors; dynamometer; occupational group; workers; GRIP STRENGTH; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PINCH STRENGTH; ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS; NORMATIVE DATA; MASS; MEN; AGE; INDEX; SPAN;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-203100
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Handgrip strength is a measurement of upper extremity functionality and an indicator of overall physical ability. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare maximum handgrip strength (MGS) between manual workers and office employees and to investigate if the expected difference is related to the anthropometric dimensions of the workers' hands and forearms. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 1740 male workers (905 light manual workers; and 835 office employees), aged 20-64 years. Maximum voluntary contractions were obtained using a JAMAR dynamometer according to the methodology proposed by the American Society of Hand Therapy (ASHT). The highest value obtained from three trials was considered as the MGS for each side. Six anthropometric dimensions (i. e ., hand length, palm length, forearm length, hand breadth, wrist circumference and forearm circumference) were measured by digital caliper and tape measure. RESULTS: Maximum handgrip strength of light manual workers (52.7 +/- 8.5 kg) was significantly higher than that of office employees (47.3 +/- 8.4 kg) (p < 0.001). Maximum handgrip strength was positively correlated with Hand breadth (r= 0.781 for light manual workers and r = 0.766 for office employees; p < 0.001) and Forearm circumference (r = 0.741 for light manual workers and r= 0.752 for office employees; p < 0.001); the only dimensions which were significantly different between the two studied job groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study revealed that light manual workers are approximately 12.4% stronger than office employees in terms of maximum handgrip force. It is therefore imperative to consider the observed differences in clinical, workstations, and hand tool designs in order to increase efficiency and comfort at work.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 687
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Martin-Ruiz C, 2014, LIFE COURSE APPROACH, P177
  • [32] Hand Grip Strength: Age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study
    Massy-Westropp N.M.
    Gill T.K.
    Taylor A.W.
    Bohannon R.W.
    Hill C.L.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)
  • [33] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF GRIP AND PINCH STRENGTH EVALUATIONS
    MATHIOWETZ, V
    WEBER, K
    VOLLAND, G
    KASHMAN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 9A (02): : 222 - 226
  • [34] Mirakhorlo M., 2016, International Biomechanics, V3, P40, DOI DOI 10.1080/23335432.2016.1191373
  • [35] Increasing Warehouse Productivity With an Ergonomic Handheld Scanner
    Nair, Chandra
    Tsiopanos, Konstantinos
    Martin, Richard
    Marshall, Graham
    [J]. ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2018, 26 (03) : 23 - 31
  • [36] Pereira AF, 2013, ACTA MEDICA PORT, V26, P51
  • [37] Revised normative values for grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer
    Peters, Martine J. H.
    van Nes, Sonja I.
    Vanhoutte, Els K.
    Bakkers, Mayienne
    van Doorn, Pieter A.
    Merkies, Ingemar S. J.
    Faber, Catharina G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2011, 16 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [38] Peterson CH, 2005, BIOSCIENCE, V55, P887, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0887:ATEIOB]2.0.CO
  • [39] 2
  • [40] Normative hand grip strength and prediction models for Iranian office employees
    Rostamzadeh, Sajjad
    Saremi, Mahnaz
    Tabatabaei, Shahnaz
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2019, 62 (02): : 233 - 241