Comparison of the safety and efficacy of a combination tablet of niacin extended release and simvastatin vs simvastatin monotherapy in patients with increased non-HDL cholesterol (from the SEACOAST I study)

被引:71
作者
Ballantyne, Christie M. [1 ,2 ]
Davidson, Michael H. [4 ]
McKenney, James [5 ]
Keller, Laurence H. [6 ]
Bajorunas, Daiva R. [6 ]
Karas, Richard H. [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Natl Clin Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
[6] Abbott, Weston, FL USA
[7] Mol Cardiol Res Inst, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.092
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The efficacy and safety of 2 regimens of a combination of a proprietary niacin extended release plus simvastatin (NER/S; 1,000/20 and 2,000/20 mg/day) were compared with simvastatin monotherapy (20 mg/day) for 24 weeks in 319 high-risk patients with predominantly mixed dyslipidemia who were already at National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III risk-adjusted goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. After a run-in on simvastatin 20 mg/day, both NER/S doses (1,000/20 and 2,000/20 mg/day) resulted in greater decreases in non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol vs simvastatin 20 mg/day (-13.9% and -215% vs -7.4%, respectively; p <0.01). Significant improvements in HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), and total/HDL cholesterol ratio were also observed. Patients with hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides >= 200 mg/dl) typically had greater lipid responses to NER/S with the notable exception that HDL cholesterol responses to NER/S were similar in those with or without increased triglycerides. Treatment with both doses of NER/S was well tolerated; <= 60% of patients in any treatment group experienced flushing, >90% of flushing was mild or moderate in intensity, and only 7.5% of patients in both NER/S treatment groups discontinued because of flushing. The safety of NER/S was consistent with the safety profile of each individual component. In conclusion, this study showed that NER/S provided additional clinically relevant improvements in multiple lipid parameters and was safe and well tolerated. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1436
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] ALLAIN CC, 1974, CLIN CHEM, V20, P470
  • [2] Rationale for combination therapy with statin drugs in the treatment of dyslipidemia
    Ansell B.J.
    [J]. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2005, 7 (1) : 29 - 33
  • [3] BALLANTYNE CM, IN PRESS J CLIN LIPI
  • [4] Cole TG, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P712
  • [5] FRIEDEWALD WT, 1972, CLIN CHEM, V18, P499
  • [6] GOLDBERG AC, 1989, CLIN THER, V11, P69
  • [7] Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Final Report
    Grundy, SM
    Becker, D
    Clark, LT
    Cooper, RS
    Denke, MA
    Howard, WJ
    Hunninghake, DB
    Illingworth, R
    Luepker, RV
    McBride, P
    McKenney, JM
    Pasternak, RC
    Stone, NJ
    Van Horn, L
    Brewer, HB
    Cleeman, JI
    Ernst, ND
    Gordon, D
    Levy, D
    Rifkind, B
    Rossouw, JE
    Savage, P
    Haffner, SM
    Orloff, DG
    Proschan, MA
    Schwartz, JS
    Sempos, CT
    Shero, ST
    Murray, EZ
    Keller, SA
    Jehle, AJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (25) : 3143 - 3421
  • [8] Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines
    Grundy, SM
    Cleeman, JI
    Merz, CNB
    Brewer, HB
    Clark, LT
    Hunninghake, DB
    Pasternak, RC
    Smith, SC
    Stone, NJ
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (02) : 227 - 239
  • [9] KOHLMEIER M, 1986, CLIN CHEM, V32, P63
  • [10] Apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A-I: risk indicators of coronary heart disease and targets for lipid-modifying therapy
    Walldius, G
    Jungner, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 255 (02) : 188 - 205