Visual information gain and task asymmetry interact in bimanual force coordination and control

被引:24
作者
Hu, Xiaogang [1 ]
Newell, Karl M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Visual gain; Constraints; Constraints interaction; Bimanual coupling; Isometric force; ISOMETRIC FORCE; INTERLIMB COORDINATION; MOTOR BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK; ERROR; CONSTRAINTS; VARIABILITY; INDEPENDENCE; OPTIMIZATION; DIRECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-011-2760-6
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study examined the question of whether and how the influence of visual information on force coordination patterns is dependent on the settings of a task asymmetry constraint. In a bimanual isometric force experiment, the task asymmetry was manipulated via imposing different coefficients on the index finger forces such that the weighted sum of the finger forces matched the target force. The environmental constraint was quantified by the visual performance error and was manipulated through the change of visual gain (number of pixels on the screen representing the unit of force). The constraint arising from the individual was quantified by the bilateral coupling effect (i.e., symmetric force production) between hands. The results revealed improved performance in terms of lower variability and performance error and more complex total force structure with higher visual gain. The influence of visual gain on the force coordination pattern, however, was found to be dependent on the task coefficients imposed on the finger forces. Namely, the force sharing between hands became more symmetric with high visual gain only when the right finger force had the higher coefficient, and an error-compensatory strategy was evident with high gain only when symmetric coefficients were imposed on the two fingers. The findings support the proposition that the motor coordination and control patterns are organized by the interactive influence of different categories of constraints where the functional influence of the information provided is dependent on the motor output.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Greater amount of visual feedback decreases force variability by reducing force oscillations from 0-1 and 3-7 Hz [J].
Baweja, Harsimran S. ;
Kennedy, Deanna M. ;
Vu, Julie ;
Vaillancourt, David E. ;
Christou, Evangelos A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 108 (05) :935-943
[2]   Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions [J].
Baweja, Harsimran S. ;
Patel, Bhavini K. ;
Martinkewiz, Julie D. ;
Vu, Julie ;
Christou, Evangelos A. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 197 (01) :35-47
[3]   Sensory Reweighting in Targeted Reaching: Effects of Conscious Effort, Error History, and Target Salience [J].
Block, Hannah J. ;
Bastian, Amy J. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 103 (01) :206-217
[4]   Visual feedback attenuates force fluctuations induced by a stressor [J].
Christou, EA .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 (12) :2126-2133
[5]   THE PERCEPTIONS OF FORCE AND OF MOVEMENT IN A MAN WITHOUT LARGE MYELINATED SENSORY AFFERENTS BELOW THE NECK [J].
COLE, JD ;
SEDGWICK, EM .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1992, 449 :503-515
[6]   Selective Regions of the Visuomotor System Are Related to Gain-Induced Changes in Force Error [J].
Coombes, Stephen A. ;
Corcos, Daniel M. ;
Sprute, Lisa ;
Vaillancourt, David E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 103 (04) :2114-2123
[7]  
Davids K., DYNAMICS SKILL ACQUI
[8]   Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion [J].
Ernst, MO ;
Banks, MS .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6870) :429-433
[9]   VOLUNTARY ACTIVATION OF HUMAN MOTOR AXONS IN THE ABSENCE OF MUSCLE AFFERENT FEEDBACK - THE CONTROL OF THE DEAFFERENTED HAND [J].
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MACEFIELD, G ;
BURKE, D ;
MCKENZIE, DK .
BRAIN, 1990, 113 :1563-1581
[10]   Motor Memory and Local Minimization of Error and Effort, Not Global Optimization, Determine Motor Behavior [J].
Ganesh, G. ;
Haruno, M. ;
Kawato, M. ;
Burdet, E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 104 (01) :382-390