Quantifying the Benefits and Ecosystem Services Provided by Green Roofs-A Review

被引:23
作者
Nguyen, Cuong Ngoc [1 ]
Muttil, Nitin [1 ,2 ]
Tariq, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman [1 ,2 ]
Ng, Anne W. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ, Inst Sustainable Ind & Liveable Cities, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[2] Victoria Univ, Coll Engn & Sci, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[3] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Engn Informat Technol & Environm, Brinkin, NT 0810, Australia
关键词
WSUD; green roofs; ecosystem services; quantify benefits; large-scale implementation; EVALUATE RUNOFF QUALITY; PILOT-SCALE EVALUATION; THERMAL PERFORMANCE; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; LIFE-CYCLE; WATER QUANTITY; LONG-TERM; HYDROLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; COOLING PERFORMANCE; STORMWATER RUNOFF;
D O I
10.3390/w14010068
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water-sensitive urban design (WSUD) has been widely used in cities to mitigate the negative consequences of urbanization and climate change. One of the WSUD strategies that is becoming popular is green roofs (GR) which offer a wide range of ecosystem services. Research on this WSUD strategy has been continuously increasing in terms of both quantity and quality. This paper presents a comprehensive review quantifying the benefits of GRs in papers published since 2010. More precisely, this review aims to provide up-to-date information about each GR benefit and how they have improved over the last decade. In agreement with previous reviews, extensive GRs were considerably researched, as compared to very limited studies on intensive and semi-intensive GRs. Each GR ecosystem service was specifically quantified, and an imbalance of GR research focus was identified, wherein urban heat- and runoff-related benefits were outstandingly popular when compared to other benefits. The results also highlight the recent introduction of hybrid GRs, which demonstrated improvements in GR performance. Furthermore, limitations of GRs, obstacles to their uptake, and inconsistent research findings were also identified in this review. Accordingly, opportunities for future research were pointed out in this review. This paper also recommends future studies to improve upon well-known GR benefits by exploring and applying more innovative GR construction techniques and materials. At the same time, further studies need to be undertaken on inadequately studied GR benefits, such as reduced noise and air pollution. In spite of the existence of reliable modelling tools, their application to study the effects of large-scale implementations of GRs has been restricted. Insufficient information from such research is likely to restrict large-scale implementations of GRs. As a result, further studies are required to transform the GR concept into one of the widely accepted and implemented WSUD strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   A Review of Green Roof Applications for Managing Urban Stormwater in Different Climatic Zones [J].
Akther, Musa ;
He, Jianxun ;
Chu, Angus ;
Huang, Jian ;
van Duin, Bert .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[2]   The exchangeability and leachability of metals from select green roof growth substrates [J].
Alsup S. ;
Ebbs S. ;
Retzlaff W. .
Urban Ecosystems, 2010, 13 (1) :91-111
[3]   Heavy metals in leachate from simulated green roof systems [J].
Alsup, Sarah E. ;
Ebbs, Stephen D. ;
Battaglia, Loretta L. ;
Retzlaff, William A. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 37 (11) :1709-1717
[4]   Green roofs in European climates. Are effective solutions for the energy savings in air-conditioning? [J].
Ascione, Fabrizio ;
Bianco, Nicola ;
de'Rossi, Filippo ;
Turni, Gianluca ;
Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 104 :845-859
[5]   Test box experiment and simulations of a green-roof: Thermal and energy performance of a residential building standard for Mexico [J].
Avila-Hernandez, A. ;
Sima, E. ;
Xaman, J. ;
Hernandez-Perez, I. ;
Tellez-Velazquez, E. ;
Chagolla-Aranda, M. A. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 209
[6]   Thermal regulation capacity of a green roof system in the mediterranean region: The effects of vegetation and irrigation level [J].
Azenas, V. ;
Cuxart, J. ;
Picos, R. ;
Medrano, H. ;
Simo, G. ;
Lopez-Grifol, A. ;
Gulias, J. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 164 :226-238
[7]   Assessment of a green roof practice using the coupled SWMM and HYDRUS models [J].
Baek, SangSoo ;
Ligaray, Mayzonee ;
Pachepsky, Yakov ;
Chun, Jong Ahn ;
Yoon, Kwang-Sik ;
Park, Yongeun ;
Cho, Kyung Hwa .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 261
[8]   Ecophysiological and micromorphological characterization of green roof vegetation for urban mitigation [J].
Baraldi, Rita ;
Neri, Luisa ;
Costa, Federica ;
Facini, Osvaldo ;
Rapparini, Francesca ;
Carriero, Giulia .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2019, 37 :24-32
[9]   Modeling the hydrologic effects of watershed-scale green roof implementation in the Pacific Northwest, United States [J].
Barnhart, Brad ;
Pettus, Paul ;
Halama, Jonathan ;
McKane, Robert ;
Mayer, Paul ;
Djang, Kevin ;
Brookes, Allen ;
Moskal, L. Monika .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 277
[10]   Amending greenroof soil with biochar to affect runoff water quantity and quality [J].
Beck, Deborah A. ;
Johnson, Gwynn R. ;
Spolek, Graig A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2011, 159 (8-9) :2111-2118