Comparison of open-circuit respiration chambers with a micrometeorological method for determining methane emissions from beef cattle grazing a tropical pasture

被引:33
作者
Tomkins, N. W. [1 ]
McGinn, S. M. [2 ]
Turner, D. A. [3 ]
Charmley, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Livestock Ind JM Rendel Lab, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Land & Environm, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Cattle; Methane; Micrometeorology; Dispersion; Rhodes grass; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NORTHERN AUSTRALIA; DISPERSION; PREDICTION; QUALITY; DAIRY; MODEL; SPECTROSCOPY; RUMINANTS; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.014
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Emissions of CH(4) methane from beef cattle grazing pastures characteristic of northern Australia are yet to be reliably quantified. Poor quality pastures and low animal productivity are typically associated with high CH(4) emissions/unit animal product. Our study reports two independent methodologies to quantify CH(4) emissions from beef cattle at herd scale and from individual animals. The first method identifies each animal within a herd (n = 18) as a point source of CH(4). Emissions at the herd scale were estimated with a backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLs) dispersion model. This model used atmospheric turbulence data and line-averaged concentrations of CH(4) measured with an open-path laser and inputs (ppm) from 5 paths across 1 ha Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) dominated pastures that were flat and free of obstructions. The second method used open circuit respiration chambers to measure 24 h CH(4) emissions from 18 steers fed freshly cut forage from the same pasture. The CH(4) emissions determined using the dispersion method were 136.1 +/- 21.5 g/d or 29.7 +/- 3.70 g/kg dry matter (DM) intake and 114 +/- 5.1 g/d or 30.1 +/- 2.19 g/kg DM intake using open circuit respiration chambers. Estimates of CH(4) emissions based on predictive algorithms for beef cattle grazing similar pastures range from 82.7 +/- 3.98 g/d to 112.7 +/- 2.57 g/d. Additional studies with different tropical pastures and herds are required to obtain estimated CH(4) emission values for further comparisons with predictions from the Australian Greenhouse Gas Inventory and those currently reported in the literature for beef cattle. This paper is part of the special issue entitled: Greenhouse Gases in Animal Agriculture Finding a Balance between Food and Emissions, Guest Edited by T.A. McAllister, Section Guest Editors; K.A. Beauchemin, X. Hao, S. McGinn and Editor for Animal Feed Science and Technology, P.H. Robinson. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 247
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*ABARE, 2007, NO AUSTR REG OUTL C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, NUTR REQ RUM LIV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, AGR FORESTRY OTHER L
[4]  
BROUWER E, 1965, P 3 EAAP S EN MET, V11, P441
[5]   Predicting livestock productivity and methane emissions in northern Australia: development of a bio-economic modelling approach [J].
Charmley, E. ;
Stephens, M. L. ;
Kennedy, P. M. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2008, 48 (1-2) :109-113
[6]  
Coates D. B., 2002, NAP3116 MEAT LIV AUS
[7]  
DEMARCHI JJ, 2003, P 3 INT METH NUTR OX
[8]   A mass balance method for non-intrusive measurements of surface-air trace gas exchange [J].
Denmead, OT ;
Harper, LA ;
Freney, JR ;
Griffith, DWT ;
Leuning, R ;
Sharpe, RR .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (21) :3679-3688
[9]   Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures [J].
Dixon, R. M. ;
Coates, D. B. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 158 (3-4) :115-125
[10]   Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle [J].
Ellis, J. L. ;
Kebreab, E. ;
Odongo, N. E. ;
McBride, B. W. ;
Okine, E. K. ;
France, J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (07) :3456-3466