Fire Risk Assessment of Subway Stations Based on Combination Weighting of Game Theory and TOPSIS Method

被引:37
作者
Ju, Weiyi [1 ]
Wu, Jie [1 ]
Kang, Qingchun [1 ]
Jiang, Juncheng [1 ]
Xing, Zhixiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Changzhou Univ, Coll Environm & Safety Engn, Changzhou 213164, Peoples R China
关键词
subway station fire; risk assessment; game theory combination weighting; problems caused by construction quality; relative closeness; SAFETY; SIMULATION; CONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL;
D O I
10.3390/su14127275
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of urban modernization, traffic congestion, travel delays, and other related inconveniences have become central features in people's daily lives. The development of subway transit systems has alleviated some of these problems. However, numerous underground subway stations lack adequate fire safety protections, and this can cause rescue difficulties in the event of fire. Once the fire occurs, there will be huge property losses and casualties. In addition, this can have a vicious impact on sustainable development. Therefore, in order to make prevention in advance and implement targeted measures, we should quantify the risk and calculate the fire risk value. In this study, through consulting experts and analysis of data obtained from Changzhou Railway Company and the Emergency Management Bureau, the fire risk index system of subway stations was determined. We calculated the index weight by selecting the combination weighting method of game theory to eliminate the limitations and dependence of subjective and objective evaluation methods. The idea of relative closeness degree in TOPSIS method iwas introduced to calculate the risk value of each subway station. Finally, the subway station risk value model was established, and the risk values for each subway station were calculated and sorted. According to expert advice and the literature review, we divided the risk level into five levels, very high; high; moderate; low and very low. The results shown that 2 subway stations on Line 1 have very high fire risk, 2 subway stations on Line 1 have high fire risk, 2 subway stations on Line 1 have moderate fire risk, 8 subway stations on Line 1 have low fire risk, and 13 subway stations on Line 1 have very low fire risk. We hope that through this evaluation model method and the results to bring some references for local rail companies. Meanwhile, this evaluation model method also promotes resilience and sustainability in social development.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Prioritising investments in safety measures in the chemical industry by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process [J].
Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim ;
Milazzo, Maria Francesca ;
Selvik, Jon T. ;
Asche, Frank ;
Abrahamsen, Hakon Bjorheim .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 198
[2]   A stochastic approach to evaluating the economic impact of disruptions in feedstock pipelines on downstream production [J].
Al-Douri, Ahmad ;
Halim, Syeda Zohra ;
Quddus, Noor ;
Kazantzi, Vasiliki ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2022, 162 :187-199
[3]   Integration of Functional Resonance Analysis with Multicriteria Analysis for Sociotechnical Systems Risk Management [J].
Alboghobeish, Ali ;
Shirali, Gholam Abbas .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (04) :882-895
[4]   Determination of optimal renewable energy growth strategies using SWOT analysis, hybrid MCDM methods, and game theory: A case study [J].
Almutairi, Khalid ;
Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini ;
Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini ;
Mostafaeipour, Ali ;
Hoa, Ao Xuan ;
Techato, Kuaanan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (05) :6766-6789
[5]   Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS [J].
Bian, Tian ;
Zheng, Haoyang ;
Yin, Likang ;
Deng, Yong .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (04) :501-515
[6]   Risk Index Method-A Tool for Building Fire Safety Assessments [J].
Brzezinska, Dorota ;
Bryant, Paul .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (08)
[7]   A new approach to determine maintenance periods of the most critical hydroelectric power plant equipment [J].
Bulut, Merve ;
Ozcan, Evrencan .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 205
[8]   AHP, a Reliable Method for Quality Decision Making: A Case Study in Business [J].
Canco, Irina ;
Kruja, Drita ;
Iancu, Tiberiu .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
[9]   A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm [J].
Carpitella, Silvia ;
Mzougui, Ilyas ;
Benitez, Julio ;
Carpitella, Fortunato ;
Certa, Antonella ;
Izquierdo, Joaquin ;
La Cascia, Marco .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 205
[10]   An Optimum Irrigation Schedule with Aeration for Greenhouse Tomato Cultivations Based on Entropy Evaluation Method [J].
Chen, Hui ;
Shang, Zi-Hui ;
Cai, Huan-Jie ;
Zhu, Yan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)