Strategic and practical implications in decision making and planning for sustainability

被引:3
作者
Plass, N. [1 ]
Kaltenegger, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Sust Tech & Syst, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
decision making; planning; Sustainability; tools; frameworks; participation;
D O I
10.1177/1420326X07078645
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper describes how the competence of decision makers and those involved in the decision making process might profit by using supportive decision making tools for sustainability in practice. Based on the analysis of several case studies and a collection of tools, suggestions for different approaches in decision making have been analysed to describe both advantages and obstacles in planning and decision making. Following a holistic view on the subject of decision making, the EU financed project Practical Evaluation Tools for Urban Sustainability (PETUS) aimed to describe important necessities - the interaction between stakeholders, requirements for trying to understand each others situation, being prepared for new arrangements, being ready to collect and deal with new information and the usefulness of support through instruments. The development of the Decision Support System that includes a matrix and a checklist is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 215
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Ascher W., 1978, FORECASTING APPRAISA
[3]  
BERGER G, 2002, 301 ICCR
[4]  
BRUNTLAND GH, 1987, COMMON FUTURE WORLD
[5]  
Hopkins Lewis D., 2001, Urban development: The logic of making plans
[6]  
Kelly E.D., 2000, Community Planning: An Introduction to the Comprehensive Plan
[7]   LOGIC OF POLICY AND SUCCESSFUL POLICIES [J].
KERR, DH .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1976, 7 (03) :351-363
[8]  
Landry C., 2000, CREATIVE CITY
[9]   Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle [J].
Mastop, H ;
Faludi, A .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1997, 24 (06) :815-832
[10]  
*OGUT, 2005, HDB OFF ZUK GEM GEST