Cotton yield and fiber quality affected by row spacing and shading at different growth stages

被引:43
|
作者
Echer, Fabio R. [1 ]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Dept Crop Sci, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
关键词
Photosynthesis; Boll weight; Light; Plant population; ULTRA-NARROW ROW; PLANT-DENSITY; LINT YIELD; RESPONSES; MATURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2015.01.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Carbohydrate production and reproductive structure development in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) depends on light availability, a determinant of cotton yield. Light availability is decreased by cloud cover or self-shading when cotton plants are grown in dense populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of shading during cotton growth and its interactions with plant row spacings on yield and fiber quality. Three independent experiments were conducted as follows: in Paranapanema (23 degrees 39'S; 48 degrees 58'W), cotton was planted in November in row spacings of 0.45, 0.75 and 0.96m; in Primavera do Leste (15 degrees 33'S; 54 degrees 11'W), planting was in January with at row spacings of 0.45 and 0.76 m; and in Chapaddo do Ceu (18 degrees 38'S; 52 degrees 40'W), cotton was planted in February in rows spaced at 0.45 and 0.90 m. Plants were exposed to shading during the phenological stages B1 (floral bud), F1 (early flowering), PF (peak flowering) and 3OB (fruit maturity). In addition, there was one treatment without shade. There were no interactions of crop spacing with shading. Increasing plant population and shading both decreased net photosynthetic rate. The number of bolls m(-2) increased with higher plant populations only when planting was delayed, and were not affected by shading. When cotton was planted in November and January, higher yields were obtained at 0.75/0.76 m, but when planting was delayed to February, 0.45 m resulted in higher yields with no effect on fiber quality. Shading for eight or ten days decreases boll weight and yields, but do not affect fiber quality. Cotton yield is the most decreased when shading occurs during flowering. These results may be used to build management strategies to minimize shading effects by adjusting cotton sowing time and plant density, by selecting cultivars with increased shade tolerance and by choosing an adequate irrigation period to improve yield. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Irrigated Sweet Sorghum Yield as Affected by Plant Spacing and Row Width
    Ottman, M. J.
    Ray, D. T.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (03) : 1008 - 1016
  • [32] Effect of Different Application Methods of Humic Acid on Cotton Yield, Plant Growth and Fiber Quality
    Tarhan, Mehmet
    Karademir, Emine
    KSU TARIM VE DOGA DERGISI-KSU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURE, 2019, 22 (04): : 537 - 546
  • [33] Effects of chemical regulation on the growth, yield and fiber quality of cotton varieties with different plant architectures
    Ye, Sihong
    Gao, Jin
    Sun, Jianxiong
    Pan, Zongjin
    Liu, Fei
    Deng, Xiaonan
    Han, Wenbing
    Yang, Hua
    Wang, Baohua
    Wang, Wei
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2024, 52 (03)
  • [34] Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by row spacing and weed competition durations
    Maqbool, M. M.
    Tanveer, A.
    Ata, Z.
    Ahmad, R.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2006, 38 (04) : 1227 - 1236
  • [35] Melatonin and mepiquat chloride impact on cotton growth, physiological and yield at different growth stages
    Ahmad, Irshad
    Guanglong, Zhu
    Zhou, Guisheng
    Younas, Muhammad Usama
    Yan, Xuebing
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2025, 226
  • [36] Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality
    Iptas, S.
    Acar, A. A.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (11) : 515 - 522
  • [37] EFFECTS OF ROW SPACING AND COTTON CULTIVARS ON SEEDLING DISEASES, VERTICILLIUM WILT, AND YIELD
    MINTON, EB
    CROP SCIENCE, 1980, 20 (03) : 347 - 350
  • [38] Effect of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality
    Stone, P
    Pearson, A
    Sorensen, I
    Rogers, B
    AGRONOMY NEW ZEALAND, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, 30 : 67 - 75
  • [39] Effect of in-row spacing on individual tree growth, yield and orchard productivity on different rootstocks
    Hrotkó, K
    Hanusz, B
    Magyar, L
    KEY PROCESSES IN THE GROWTH AND CROPPING OF DECIDUOUS FRUIT AND NUT TREES, 2004, (636): : 667 - 674
  • [40] Development and yield of the cotton plant under different row spacings and growth regulator application
    Ferrari, Samuel
    Furlani, Enes, Jr.
    Ferrari, Joao Vitor
    Santos, Marcio Lustosa
    Aires dos Santos, Danilo Marcelo
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2008, 30 (03): : 365 - 371