Cotton yield and fiber quality affected by row spacing and shading at different growth stages

被引:43
|
作者
Echer, Fabio R. [1 ]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Dept Crop Sci, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
关键词
Photosynthesis; Boll weight; Light; Plant population; ULTRA-NARROW ROW; PLANT-DENSITY; LINT YIELD; RESPONSES; MATURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2015.01.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Carbohydrate production and reproductive structure development in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) depends on light availability, a determinant of cotton yield. Light availability is decreased by cloud cover or self-shading when cotton plants are grown in dense populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of shading during cotton growth and its interactions with plant row spacings on yield and fiber quality. Three independent experiments were conducted as follows: in Paranapanema (23 degrees 39'S; 48 degrees 58'W), cotton was planted in November in row spacings of 0.45, 0.75 and 0.96m; in Primavera do Leste (15 degrees 33'S; 54 degrees 11'W), planting was in January with at row spacings of 0.45 and 0.76 m; and in Chapaddo do Ceu (18 degrees 38'S; 52 degrees 40'W), cotton was planted in February in rows spaced at 0.45 and 0.90 m. Plants were exposed to shading during the phenological stages B1 (floral bud), F1 (early flowering), PF (peak flowering) and 3OB (fruit maturity). In addition, there was one treatment without shade. There were no interactions of crop spacing with shading. Increasing plant population and shading both decreased net photosynthetic rate. The number of bolls m(-2) increased with higher plant populations only when planting was delayed, and were not affected by shading. When cotton was planted in November and January, higher yields were obtained at 0.75/0.76 m, but when planting was delayed to February, 0.45 m resulted in higher yields with no effect on fiber quality. Shading for eight or ten days decreases boll weight and yields, but do not affect fiber quality. Cotton yield is the most decreased when shading occurs during flowering. These results may be used to build management strategies to minimize shading effects by adjusting cotton sowing time and plant density, by selecting cultivars with increased shade tolerance and by choosing an adequate irrigation period to improve yield. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Different sowing dates affected cotton yield and yield components
    Huang, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2016, 10 (01) : 63 - 83
  • [22] Cotton (Gossypiurn barbadense L.) Yield and Fiber Properties as Affected by Plant Growth Retardants and Plant Density
    Sawan, Zakaria M.
    Mahmoud, Mahmoud H.
    Fahmy, Ashraf. H.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2008, 21 (02) : 171 - 189
  • [23] Forage yield of sugarcane growing in different row spacing and harvesting periods
    Muraro, Gisele Bonato
    Rossi Junior, Paulo
    Bachmann Schogor, Ana Luiza
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2011, 35 (01): : 131 - 136
  • [24] SUNFLOWER GRAIN YIELD AT DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF ROW SPACING AND PLANT DENSITY
    Marin, Victorita
    Ion, Viorel
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2022, 65 (02): : 395 - 402
  • [25] EFFECT OF ROW SPACING AND SEEDING RATE ON HUNGARIAN VETCH YIELD AND QUALITY
    Albayrak, Sebahattin
    Turk, Mevlut
    Yuksel, Osman
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2011, 16 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [26] Yield and nutritional quality of greenhouse lettuce as affected by shading and cultivation season
    Kosma, C.
    Triantafyllidis, V.
    Papasavvas, A.
    Salahas, G.
    Patakas, A.
    EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2013, 25 (12): : 974 - 979
  • [27] Growth and yield of anthurium under different shading screens
    Nomura, Edson Shigueaki
    Lima, Juliana Domingues
    Rodrigues, Domingos Savio
    Garcia, Valeria Augusta
    Fuzitani, Eduardo Jun
    Modenese-Gorla da Silva, Silvia Helena
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2009, 39 (05): : 1394 - 1400
  • [28] Mid-South Soybean Yield and Net Return as Affected by Plant Population and Row Spacing
    Thompson, Nathanael M.
    Larson, James A.
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Roberts, Roland K.
    Mengistu, Alennu
    Bellaloui, Nacer
    Walker, Eric R.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (03) : 979 - 989
  • [29] The Response of Different Shading Applications in Terms of Yield, Quality and Antioxidant in Tomato Plant
    Kartal, Adnan
    Akhoundnejad, Yelderem
    Dasgan, Hayriye Yildiz
    Temur, Baki
    Ersoy, Lale
    KSU TARIM VE DOGA DERGISI-KSU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURE, 2024, 27 (03): : 578 - 585
  • [30] Effects of shading at different growth stages with various shading intensities on the grain yield and anthocyanin content of colored rice (Oryza sativa L.)
    Song, Shaokun
    He, Aibin
    Zhao, Tingcheng
    Yin, Qi
    Mu, Yixue
    Wang, Yidan
    Liu, Hongyan
    Nie, Lixiao
    Peng, Shaobing
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 283