Cotton yield and fiber quality affected by row spacing and shading at different growth stages

被引:43
|
作者
Echer, Fabio R. [1 ]
Rosolem, Ciro A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr Sci, Dept Crop Sci, BR-18610307 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
关键词
Photosynthesis; Boll weight; Light; Plant population; ULTRA-NARROW ROW; PLANT-DENSITY; LINT YIELD; RESPONSES; MATURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2015.01.001
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Carbohydrate production and reproductive structure development in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) depends on light availability, a determinant of cotton yield. Light availability is decreased by cloud cover or self-shading when cotton plants are grown in dense populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of shading during cotton growth and its interactions with plant row spacings on yield and fiber quality. Three independent experiments were conducted as follows: in Paranapanema (23 degrees 39'S; 48 degrees 58'W), cotton was planted in November in row spacings of 0.45, 0.75 and 0.96m; in Primavera do Leste (15 degrees 33'S; 54 degrees 11'W), planting was in January with at row spacings of 0.45 and 0.76 m; and in Chapaddo do Ceu (18 degrees 38'S; 52 degrees 40'W), cotton was planted in February in rows spaced at 0.45 and 0.90 m. Plants were exposed to shading during the phenological stages B1 (floral bud), F1 (early flowering), PF (peak flowering) and 3OB (fruit maturity). In addition, there was one treatment without shade. There were no interactions of crop spacing with shading. Increasing plant population and shading both decreased net photosynthetic rate. The number of bolls m(-2) increased with higher plant populations only when planting was delayed, and were not affected by shading. When cotton was planted in November and January, higher yields were obtained at 0.75/0.76 m, but when planting was delayed to February, 0.45 m resulted in higher yields with no effect on fiber quality. Shading for eight or ten days decreases boll weight and yields, but do not affect fiber quality. Cotton yield is the most decreased when shading occurs during flowering. These results may be used to build management strategies to minimize shading effects by adjusting cotton sowing time and plant density, by selecting cultivars with increased shade tolerance and by choosing an adequate irrigation period to improve yield. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 26
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of late planting and shading on cotton yield and fiber quality formation
    Liu, Jingran
    Meng, Yali
    Chen, Ji
    Lv, Fengjuan
    Ma, Yina
    Chen, Binglin
    Wang, Youhua
    Zhou, Zhiguo
    Oosterhuis, Derrick M.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2015, 183 : 1 - 13
  • [2] GROWTH, YIELD AND EARLINESS RESPONSE OF COTTON TO ROW SPACING AND NITROGEN MANAGEMENT
    Munir, M. K.
    Tahir, M.
    Saleem, M. F.
    Yaseen, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 2015, 25 (03) : 729 - 738
  • [3] Yield and quality of sunflower as affected by row orientation, row spacing and plant density
    Diepenbrock, W
    Long, M
    Feil, B
    BODENKULTUR, 2001, 52 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [4] Drought Effects on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality on Different Fruiting Branches
    Wang, Rui
    Ji, Shu
    Zhang, Pan
    Meng, Yali
    Wang, Youhua
    Chen, Binglin
    Zhou, Zhiguo
    CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (03) : 1265 - 1276
  • [5] Effect of Shading on Cotton Yield and Quality on Different Fruiting Branches
    Lv, Fengjuan
    Liu, Jingran
    Ma, Yina
    Chen, Ji
    Abudurezikekey, Abudou Keyoumu
    Wang, Youhua
    Chen, Binglin
    Meng, Yali
    Zhou, Zhiguo
    CROP SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (06) : 2670 - 2678
  • [6] Effect of shading on yield, fiber quality and physiological characteristics of cotton subtending leaves on different fruiting positions
    Chen, B. L.
    Yang, H. K.
    Ma, Y. N.
    Liu, J. R.
    Lv, F. J.
    Chen, J.
    Meng, Y. L.
    Wang, Y. H.
    Zhou, Z. G.
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2017, 55 (02) : 240 - 250
  • [7] Effects of row spacing and potassium foliar applications on yield of cotton
    Menefee, Dorothy
    Smith, Douglas R.
    Zwonitzer, Martha
    Collins, Harold P.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 6 (04)
  • [8] Apple yield and quality as affected by training and shading
    Chen, K
    Hu, GQ
    Lenz, F
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND WORKSHOP ON POME FRUIT QUALITY, 1998, (466): : 53 - 58
  • [9] Emergence and seed yield of redtop as affected by row spacing and sowing rate
    Szczepanek, Malgorzata
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 65 (06) : 537 - 543
  • [10] Cotton row spacing and plant density cropping systems II. Effects on seedcotton yield, boll components and lint quality
    Darawsheh, M. K.
    Chachalis, D.
    Aivalakis, G.
    Khah, E. M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (3-4): : 262 - 265