The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference

被引:717
作者
Luchs, Michael G. [1 ]
Naylor, Rebecca Walker [2 ]
Irwin, Julie R. [3 ]
Raghunathan, Rajagopal [3 ]
机构
[1] Coll William & Mary, Mason Sch Business, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Fisher Coll Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
sustainability; ethical products; green marketing; implicit associations; corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES; CONSUMER CHOICE; ATTRIBUTES; COMPASSION; INFERENCES; INTUITIONS; VALIDITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Manufacturers are increasingly producing and promoting sustainable products (i.e., products that have a positive social and/or environmental impact). However, relatively little is known about how product sustainability affects consumers' preferences. The authors propose that sustainability may not always be an asset, even if most consumers care about social and environmental issues. The degree to which sustainability enhances preference depends on the type of benefit consumers most value for the product category in question. In this research, the authors demonstrate that consumers associate higher product ethicality with gentleness-related attributes and lower product ethicality with strength-related attributes. As a consequence of these associations, the positive effect of product sustainability on consumer preferences is reduced when strength-related attributes are valued, sometimes even resulting in preferences for less sustainable product alternatives (i.e., the "sustainability liability"). Conversely, when gentleness-related attributes are valued, sustainability enhances preference. In addition, the authors show that the potential negative impact of sustainability on product preferences can be attenuated using explicit cues about product strength.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 31
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   IDENTIFICATION OF DETERMINANT ATTRIBUTES - COMPARISON OF METHODS [J].
ALPERT, MI .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1971, 8 (02) :184-191
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CONSUMER REPORTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], CONSUMER REPORTS
[4]   FORMING IMPRESSIONS OF PERSONALITY [J].
ASCH, SE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1946, 41 (03) :258-290
[5]   Protected values [J].
Baron, J ;
Spranca, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 70 (01) :1-16
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]  
*BBMG, 2007, BBMG CONSC CONS REP
[8]  
BEAVEN C, 2009, BUSINESS WEEK 0903
[9]  
BETTS K, 2009, TIME 0501
[10]   VALIDITY OF PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES AND THEIR RESEARCH AND CLINICAL CONTRIBUTION [J].
BLATT, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1975, 39 (04) :327-343