Regenerate Healing Outcomes in Unilateral Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using Quantitative Histomorphometry

被引:7
|
作者
Schwarz, Daniel A.
Arman, Krikor G.
Kakwan, Mehreen S.
Jamali, Ameen M.
Elmeligy, Ayman A.
Buchman, Steven R.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ain Shams Univ, Cairo, Egypt
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IN-VIVO EVIDENCE; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; BONE-FORMATION; HARD PALATE; OSTEOCYTES; MINERALIZATION; ADVANCEMENT; EXPRESSION; MIDFACE; OSTEODISTRACTION;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b351
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The authors' goal was to ascertain regenerate bone-healing metrics using quantitative histomorphometry at a single consolidation period. Methods: Rats underwent either mandibular distraction osteogenesis (n = 7) or partially reduced fractures (n = 7); their contralateral mandibles were used as controls (n = 11). External fixators were secured and unilateral osteotomies performed, followed by either mandibular distraction osteogenesis (4 days' latency, then 0.3 mm every 12 hours for 8 days; 5.1 mm) or partially reduced fractures (fixed immediately postoperatively; 2.1 mm); both groups underwent 4 weeks of consolidation. After tissue processing, bone volume/tissue volume ratio, osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio, and osteocyte count per high-power field were analyzed by means of quantitative histomorphometry. Results: Contralateral mandibles had statistically greater bone volume/tissue volume ratio and osteocyte count per high-power field compared with both mandibular distraction osteogenesis and partially reduced fractures by almost 50 percent, whereas osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio was statistically greater in both mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures compared with contralateral mandibles. No statistical difference in bone volume/tissue volume ratio, osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio, or osteocyte count per high-power field was found between mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures. Conclusions: The authors' findings demonstrate significantly decreased bone quantity and maturity in mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures compared with contralateral mandibles using the clinically analogous protocols. If these results are extrapolated clinically, treatment strategies may require modification to ensure reliable, predictable, and improved outcomes. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126: 795, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Altug-Atac, Ayse T.
    Grayson, Barry H.
    McCarthy, Joseph G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (05) : 1751 - 1759
  • [32] Unilateral Mandibular Hypoplasia in Adult Patients: Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Osteotomies in a Standardized Sequence
    Gerbino, Giovanni
    Bianchi, Francesca Antonella
    Verze, Laura
    Ramieri, Guglielmo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (06) : 1959 - 1966
  • [33] Effects of unilateral vertical mandibular distraction osteogenesis on airway anatomy in children with hemifacial microsomia
    Pourtaheri, Navid
    Wang, Derek Z.
    Susarla, Srinivas M.
    Mundinger, Gerhard S.
    Kumar, Anand R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (12) : 2041 - 2045
  • [34] Biomechanical effects of surgical cut direction in unilateral mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using a finite element model
    Tehranchi, A.
    Behnia, H.
    Heidarpour, M.
    Toutiaee, B.
    Khosropour, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (05) : 667 - 672
  • [35] Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis
    Block, MS
    Chang, A
    Crawford, C
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (03) : 309 - 314
  • [36] Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices
    van Strijen, PJ
    Breuning, KH
    Becking, AG
    Tuinzing, DB
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2003, 96 (04): : 392 - 397
  • [37] Effect of unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis on mandibular morphology in rabbits with antigen-induced temporomandibular joint arthritis
    Andersen, K.
    Pedersen, T. K.
    Svendsen, P.
    Hauge, E. M.
    Schou, S.
    Norholt, S. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (08) : 1052 - 1059
  • [38] A Quantitative Analysis of Weight Gain Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Robin Sequence
    Gary, Cyril S.
    Marczewski, Sharon
    Vitagliano, Patricia M.
    Sawh-Martinez, Rajendra
    Wu, Robin
    Steinbacher, Derek M.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (03) : 676 - 682
  • [39] Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model
    Kunz, C.
    Adolphs, N.
    Buescher, P.
    Hammer, B.
    Rahn, B.
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2005, 9 (03): : 169 - 176
  • [40] Double-step transport distraction osteogenesis in the reconstruction of unilateral large mandibular defects after tumour resection using internal distraction devices
    Wang, J. J.
    Chen, J.
    Ping, F. Y.
    Yan, F. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (05) : 587 - 595