Regenerate Healing Outcomes in Unilateral Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using Quantitative Histomorphometry

被引:7
|
作者
Schwarz, Daniel A.
Arman, Krikor G.
Kakwan, Mehreen S.
Jamali, Ameen M.
Elmeligy, Ayman A.
Buchman, Steven R.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ain Shams Univ, Cairo, Egypt
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IN-VIVO EVIDENCE; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; BONE-FORMATION; HARD PALATE; OSTEOCYTES; MINERALIZATION; ADVANCEMENT; EXPRESSION; MIDFACE; OSTEODISTRACTION;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b351
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The authors' goal was to ascertain regenerate bone-healing metrics using quantitative histomorphometry at a single consolidation period. Methods: Rats underwent either mandibular distraction osteogenesis (n = 7) or partially reduced fractures (n = 7); their contralateral mandibles were used as controls (n = 11). External fixators were secured and unilateral osteotomies performed, followed by either mandibular distraction osteogenesis (4 days' latency, then 0.3 mm every 12 hours for 8 days; 5.1 mm) or partially reduced fractures (fixed immediately postoperatively; 2.1 mm); both groups underwent 4 weeks of consolidation. After tissue processing, bone volume/tissue volume ratio, osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio, and osteocyte count per high-power field were analyzed by means of quantitative histomorphometry. Results: Contralateral mandibles had statistically greater bone volume/tissue volume ratio and osteocyte count per high-power field compared with both mandibular distraction osteogenesis and partially reduced fractures by almost 50 percent, whereas osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio was statistically greater in both mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures compared with contralateral mandibles. No statistical difference in bone volume/tissue volume ratio, osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio, or osteocyte count per high-power field was found between mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures. Conclusions: The authors' findings demonstrate significantly decreased bone quantity and maturity in mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures compared with contralateral mandibles using the clinically analogous protocols. If these results are extrapolated clinically, treatment strategies may require modification to ensure reliable, predictable, and improved outcomes. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126: 795, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reconstruction of the mandibular condyle using transport distraction osteogenesis
    StuckiMcCormick, SU
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 8 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [22] Mandibular functional reconstruction using internal distraction osteogenesis
    Wang, X
    Lin, Y
    Yi, B
    Wang, XX
    Liang, C
    Li, ZL
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 115 (12) : 1863 - 1867
  • [23] Management of Mandibular Hypoplasia Using Distraction Osteogenesis Technique
    陶学金
    樊敏
    凌翔
    陈卫民
    华中科技大学学报(医学英德文版), 2004, (01) : 92 - 94
  • [24] Management of mandibular hypoplasia using distraction osteogenesis technique
    Tao Xuejin
    Fan min
    Ling Xiang
    Chen Weimin
    Current Medical Science, 2004, 24 (1) : 92 - 94
  • [25] Quantitative Results of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Pierre Robin Infants Using a Vertical Ramus Osteotomy and Internal Distraction Device
    Fairbanks, G.
    Varkarakis, G.
    Scherer, A.
    Havlik, R. J.
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEEN CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY AND PARIS DISTRACTION SYMPOSIUM, 2009, : 99 - 104
  • [26] The effect of periosteal injury and masticatory micromovement on the healing of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site
    Sun, Zongyang
    Herring, Susan W.
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (03) : 205 - 215
  • [27] Comprehensive Long-Term Outcomes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Kosyk, Mychajlo S.
    Salinero, Lauren K.
    Morales, Carrie Z.
    Shakir, Sameer
    Cielo, Christopher M.
    Scott, Michelle
    Nah, Hyun-Duck
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    Swanson, Jordan W.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2025, 62 (01): : 108 - 116
  • [28] Treatment outcomes of archwise distraction osteogenesis in mandibular dentoalveolar retrognathia cases
    Yondem, C.
    Acar, Y. B.
    Sener, B. C.
    Erverdi, A. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 46 (08) : 1007 - 1016
  • [29] Outcomes Analysis of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for the Treatment of Pierre Robin Sequence
    Murage, Kariuki P.
    Tholpady, Sunil S.
    Friel, Michael
    Havlik, Robert J.
    Flores, Roberto L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (02) : 419 - 421
  • [30] A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Craniofacial Syndromes on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Outcomes
    Patel, Raina Kushal
    Stanton, Eloise W.
    Bakovic, Melanie
    Mejia, Valeria
    Pekcan, Asli
    Ayala-Chavez, Cuauhtemoc
    Shakoori, Pasha
    Urata, Mark M.
    Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2025,