Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

被引:24
作者
Eriksson, L. [1 ]
Hall, P. [1 ]
Czene, K. [1 ]
Silva, I. dos Santos [2 ]
McCormack, V. [2 ,3 ]
Bergh, J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bjohle, J. [4 ,5 ]
Ploner, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, London WC1E 7HT, England
[3] Int Agcy Res Canc, Sect Environm & Radiat, F-69372 Lyon, France
[4] Karolinska Inst, Canc Ctr Karolinska, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Univ Hosp, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
breast cancer; mammographic density; molecular subtypes; RISK; WOMEN; DETERMINANTS; PERCENTAGE; SIGNATURE; PATTERNS; THERAPY; AREA;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2012.234
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling has led to a subclassification of breast cancers independent of established clinical parameters, such as the Sorlie-Perou subtypes. Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, but it is unknown if MD is associated with molecular subtypes of this carcinoma. METHODS: We investigated whether MD was associated with breast cancer subtypes in 110 women with breast cancer, operated in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1994 to 1996. Subtypes were defined using expression data from HGU133A+B chips. The MD of the unaffected breast was measured using the Cumulus software. We used multinomial logistic models to investigate the relationship between MD and Sorlie-Perou subtypes. RESULTS: Although the distribution of molecular subtypes differed in women with high vs low MD, this was statistically non-significant (P = 0.249), and further analyses revealed no association between the MD and Sorlie-Perou subtypes as a whole, nor with individual subtypes. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that although MD is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, it does not seem to be differentially associated with breast cancer molecular subtypes. However, larger studies with more comprehensive covariate information are needed to confirm these results. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 18-23. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.234 www.bjcancer.com Published online 29 May 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tamoxifen in women with breast cancer and mammographic density
    Meggiorini, M. L.
    Labi, L.
    Vestri, A. R.
    Porfiri, L. M.
    Savelli, S.
    De Felice, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) : 598 - 601
  • [32] Mammographic density as a marker of breast cancer risk?
    Jeffrey A. Tice
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2009, 1 (3) : 175 - 180
  • [33] Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer outcome
    Maskarinec, Gertraud
    Woolcott, Christy G.
    Kolonel, Laurence N.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2010, 6 (03) : 351 - 354
  • [34] Tamoxifen, Mammographic Density, and Breast Cancer Prevention
    Boyd, Norman F.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (09): : 704 - 705
  • [35] Variability in DNA Repair Capacity Levels among Molecular Breast Cancer Subtypes: Triple Negative Breast Cancer Shows Lowest Repair
    Matta, Jaime
    Ortiz, Carmen
    Encarnacion, Jarline
    Dutil, Julie
    Suarez, Erick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2017, 18 (07)
  • [36] Mammographic Breast Density Is Associated With the Development of Contralateral Breast Cancer
    Raghavendra, Akshara
    Sinha, Arup K.
    Le-Petross, Huong T.
    Garg, Naveen
    Hsu, Limin
    Patangan, Modesto, Jr.
    Bevers, Therese Bartholomew
    Shen, Yu
    Banu, Arun
    Tripathy, Debu
    Bedrosian, Isabelle
    Barcenas, Carlos H.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (11) : 1935 - 1940
  • [37] Mammographic Density Errors during Interpretation of Breast Examinations
    Pavlova, Tamara, V
    Vasilyev, Aleksandr Yu
    Buromsky, Ivan, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE, 2020, 10 (04) : 378 - 381
  • [38] Mammographic Variation Measures, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk
    Heine, John
    Fowler, Erin
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Shepherd, John
    Hruska, Carrie B.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Wu, Fang F.
    Norman, Aaron D.
    Pankratz, Vernon S.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Vachon, Celine M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (02) : 326 - 334
  • [39] Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Morrish, Oliver W. E.
    Allgood, Prue C.
    Black, Richard
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Willsher, Paula
    Cooke, Julie
    Duncan, Karen A.
    Michell, Michael J.
    Dobson, Hilary M.
    Maroni, Roberta
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Purushothaman, Hema N.
    Suaris, Tamara
    Astley, Susan M.
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Tucker, Lorraine
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 88 : 48 - 56
  • [40] The effect of breast parenchymal density on breast cancer subtypes and prognostic factors
    Yuksel, Cemil
    Culcu, Serdar
    Bakirarar, Batuhan
    Dogan, Lutfi
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 6 (04): : 181 - 186