Calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing immunosuppressive protocols

被引:27
作者
Bestard, O [1 ]
Cruzado, JM [1 ]
Grinyó, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Serv Nefrol, Hosp Llobregat, Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Barcelona 08907, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.129
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have played an important role in improving graft survival. However, the balance between preventing immunologic allograft losses and the management of CNI-related nephrotoxicity is still an issue in renal transplantation. There are three major CNI-sparing strategies. CNI Minimization. The advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows cyclosporine (CsA) reduction to ameliorate renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction, without increasing acute rejection rates. In combination with mTOR inhibitors, very low CNI levels may be sufficient to prevent acute rejection. However, in this association, CNI nephrotoxicity is magnified by pharmacokinetic interaction. CNI Withdrawal. CNI withdrawal has been attempted in regimens containing MMF or sirolimus (SRL). Introduction of MMF in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) followed by CNI withdrawal resulted in stabilization or improvement of renal function and hypertension profile, although there is some risk of acute rejection. In regimes based on SRL, CNI withdrawal is a safety strategy, achieving a sustained improvement of renal function, histology, and graft survival. There is not consensus at all whether MMF should be added or not in patients converted from CNI to mTOR inhibitor. CNI Avoidance. Polyclonal-based regimens with MMF and steroids have shown acceptable acute rejection rates, but high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and opportunistic infections. Conversely, anti-IL-2R in combination with MMF and steroids resulted in 50% incidence of acute rejection, thus suggesting that CNI avoidance is not feasible in a regimen based on MMF. Alternatively, a protocol based on anti-IL-2R induction therapy combined with SRL, MMF, and prednisone has shown an efficient prevention of acute rejection, higher creatinine clearance and lower rate of CAN in comparison with a group treated with CNI. New strategies using costimulation blockade may help in the development of safe CNI-free regimens. In summary, in renal transplantation the new immunosuppressive medications have made feasible old aspirations such as minimization, withdrawal, or even avoidance of CNI.
引用
收藏
页码:3729 / 3732
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen in stable kidney transplant recipients: A randomized, controlled study [J].
Abramowicz, D ;
Manas, D ;
Lao, M ;
Vanrenterghem, Y ;
del Castillo, D ;
Wijngaard, P ;
Fung, S .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (12) :1725-1734
[2]   A phase III prospective, randomized study to evaluate concentration-controlled sirolimus (rapamune) with cyclosporine dose minimization or elimination at six months in de novo renal allograft recipients [J].
Baboolal, K .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) :1404-1408
[3]  
DUDLEY CRK, 2002, AM TRANSPL C WASH MA
[4]   Kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitor drugs: A prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus versus cyclosporin [J].
Flechner, SM ;
Goldfarb, D ;
Modlin, C ;
Feng, JY ;
Krishnamurthi, V ;
Mastroianni, B ;
Savas, K ;
Cook, DJ ;
Novick, AC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (08) :1070-1076
[5]   Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: Results at 6 months [J].
Gonwa, T ;
Mendez, R ;
Yang, HC ;
Weinstein, S ;
Jensik, S ;
Steinberg, S .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) :1213-1220
[6]   Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on antithymocyte globulin and mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric kidney transplantation:: results after 5 years [J].
Grinyó, JM ;
Gil-Vernet, S ;
Cruzado, JM ;
Caldés, A ;
Riera, L ;
Serón, D ;
Rama, I ;
Torras, J .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 16 (11) :820-827
[7]   Pilot Randomized study of early tacrolimus withdrawal from a regimen with sirolimus plus tacrolimus in kidney transplantation [J].
Grinyo, JM ;
Campistol, JM ;
Paul, J ;
García-Martínez, J ;
Morales, JM ;
Prats, D ;
Arias, M ;
Brunet, M ;
Cabrera, J ;
Granados, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (08) :1308-1314
[8]   Sirolimus (rapamycin)-based therapy in human renal transplantation -: Similar efficacy and different toxicity compared with cyclosporine [J].
Groth, CG ;
Bäckman, L ;
Morales, JM ;
Calne, R ;
Kreis, H ;
Lang, P ;
Touraine, JL ;
Claesson, K ;
Campistol, JM ;
Durand, D ;
Wramner, L ;
Brattström, C ;
Charpentier, B .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) :1036-1042
[9]   Low-dose cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with suboptimal renal function [J].
Hueso, M ;
Bover, J ;
Serón, D ;
Gil-Vernet, S ;
Sabaté, I ;
Fulladosa, X ;
Ramos, R ;
Coll, O ;
Alsina, J ;
Grinyó, JM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) :1727-1731
[10]   Efficacy of sirolimus compared with azathioprine for reduction of acute renal allograft rejection: a randomised multicentre study [J].
Kahan, BD .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9225) :194-202