Comparative toxicity of nanostructured alumina and a commercial inert dust for Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) at varying ambient humidity levels

被引:55
作者
Stadler, Teodoro [1 ]
Buteler, Micaela [1 ,2 ]
Weaver, David K. [2 ]
Sofie, Stephen [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Cient Tecnol CONICET Mendoza, Lab Toxicol Arnbiental, Inst Med & Biol Expt Cuyo IMBECU, Mendoza, Argentina
[2] Montana State Univ, Dept Land Resources & Environm Sci, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[3] Montana State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
关键词
Nanostructured alumina; Insecticide; Diatomaceous earth; Wheat; Nanomaterial-based technology; DIATOMACEOUS-EARTH; PARTICLE FILMS; INSECTICIDAL EFFICACY; MOISTURE-CONTENT; PROBIT ANALYSIS; ACARUS-SIRO; COLEOPTERA; TEMPERATURE; TENEBRIONIDAE; BOSTRICHIDAE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jspr.2011.09.004
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
The widespread concern for environmental and human health has raised the need for new reduced-risk control strategies and the search for new chemical classes of pesticides. Recently, a novel type of particulate material, nanostructured alumina (NSA) has been found to induce mortality in insects exposed to wheat treated with NSA dust. Preliminary studies have shown insecticidal activity of NSA particles on two insect species, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), and Rhyzopertha dominica, (F.), major pests of stored grain. We investigated the toxicity of NSA and Protect-It (R) diatomaceous earth (DE) using dry dust applications at three different relative ambient humidity levels. Results showed that NSA was more effective in killing S. oryzae than Protect-(R) and was equally toxic to R. dominica. Treatment with both products also reduced progeny production. In addition, R. dominica was less susceptible to inert dusts than S. oryzae. Our results suggest that NSA might prove a good alternative or complement to DE based products, and encourage further testing with other insect pests and systems, plus experiments on delivery options to further enhance NSA products. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide [J].
Abbott, WS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1925, 18 :265-267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide
[3]   Toxicity of diatomaceous earth to red flour beetles and confused flour beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae):: Effects of temperature and relative humidity [J].
Arthur, FH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 2000, 93 (02) :526-532
[4]   Evaluation of kaolinite-based particle films to control Tribolium species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [J].
Arthur, FH ;
Puterka, GJ .
JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (04) :341-348
[5]   Immediate and delayed mortality of Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) exposed on wheat treated with diatomaceous earth:: effects of temperature, relative humidity, and exposure interval [J].
Arthur, FH .
JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (01) :13-21
[6]  
Athanassiou CG, 2004, J ECON ENTOMOL, V97, P2160, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-97.6.2160
[7]   Effect of grain type on the insecticidal efficacy of SilicoSec against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [J].
Athanassiou, CG ;
Kavallieratos, NG ;
Tsaganou, FC ;
Vayias, BJ ;
Dimizas, CB ;
Buchelos, CT .
CROP PROTECTION, 2003, 22 (10) :1141-1147
[8]   The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC [J].
Borm, Paul J. A. ;
Robbins, David ;
Haubold, Stephan ;
Kuhlbusch, Thomas ;
Fissan, Heinz ;
Donaldson, Ken ;
Schins, Roel ;
Stone, Vicki ;
Kreyling, Wolfgang ;
Lademann, Jurgen ;
Krutmann, Jean ;
Warheit, David ;
Oberdorster, Eva .
PARTICLE AND FIBRE TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 3 (01)
[9]   Efficacy of diatomaceous earth to control Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in rough rice:: Impacts of temperature and relative humidity [J].
Chanbang, Yaowaluk ;
Arthur, Frank H. ;
Wilde, Gerald E. ;
Throne, James E. .
CROP PROTECTION, 2007, 26 (07) :923-929
[10]   Toxicity studies of so-called "inert" materials with the rice weevil and the granary weevil [J].
Chiu, SF .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1939, 32 :810-821