Diminishing Returns From Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

被引:42
作者
Vogelius, Ivan R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bentzen, Soren M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Oncol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Div Biostat & Bioinformat, Greenebaum Comprehens Canc Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2020年 / 107卷 / 02期
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DOSE-RESPONSE; FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES; END-POINTS; RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; TIME; METAANALYSIS; ESCALATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: More than a decade of randomized controlled trials in prostate cancer has established a positive radiation dose response at moderate doses and a consistently low alpha/beta ratio in the linear quadratic model for moderate hypofractionation. The recently published large randomized trial of ultrahypofractionated prostate cancer radiation therapy adds substantially to our current knowledge of dose response and fractionation sensitivity. Methods and Materials: Randomized trials of dose escalation and hypofractionation of radiation therapy were meta-analyzed to yield the overall best estimate of the a/b ratio. Additionally, a putative saturation of dose effect previously reported at approximately 80 Gy EQD2 was investigated by mapping the relative effectiveness assessed at 5 years onto a single reference dose-response curve. Results: Meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials including 13,384 patients yielded a best estimate of alpha/beta = 1.6 Gy (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.0 Gy) but with highly significant heterogeneity (I-2 = 70%, P = .0005). Further analysis indicated an association between increasing dose per fraction in the experimental arm and increasing a/b ratio (slope, 0.6 Gy increase in alpha/beta per Gy increase in fraction size; P = .017). This deviation from the linear quadratic model could, however, also be explained by biochemical control maxing out at doses above approximately 80 Gy. Conclusions: Biochemical control data from randomized controlled trials of dose-per-fraction escalation in prostate cancer radiation therapy are inconsistent with the presence of a constant fractionation sensitivity in the linear-quadratic model and/or a monotonic dose response for biochemical control beyond 80 Gy equivalent dose. These observations have a potential effect on the optimal doses in future trials and the interpretation of ongoing trials of ultrahypofractionation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exposure to direct-to-consumer advertising is associated with overestimation of benefits regarding ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Caputo, Joseph M.
    Lee, Henry J.
    Chiles, Bennett
    Hyams, Elias S.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (04) : 670 - 679
  • [2] Adoption of Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Corrigan, Kelsey L.
    Lei, Xiudong
    Ahmad, Neelofur
    Arzu, Isidora
    Bloom, Elizabeth
    Chun, Stephen G.
    Goodman, Chelain
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Joyner, Melissa
    Mayo, Lauren
    Mitchell, Melissa
    Nead, Kevin T.
    Perkins, George H.
    Reed, Valerie
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Schlembach, Pamela
    Shaitelman, Simona F.
    Stauder, Michael C.
    Strom, Eric A.
    Tereffe, Welela
    Wiederhold, Lee
    Woodward, Wendy A.
    Smith, Benjamin D.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (02)
  • [3] Early Tolerance and Tumor Control Outcomes with High-dose Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Pinitpatcharalert, Attapol
    Kollmeier, Marisa
    Goldman, Debra A.
    McBride, Sean
    Gorovets, Daniel
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Varghese, Melissa
    Happersett, Laura
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Hunt, Margie
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (06): : 748 - 755
  • [4] Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Koontz, Bridget F.
    Lee, W. Robert
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 22 (03) : 483 - +
  • [5] Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Combined With Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized, Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a Prospective Trial
    Kollmeier, Marisa A.
    McBride, Sean
    Varghese, Melissa
    Debonis, Dylan
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Cohen, Gilad
    Damato, Antonio L.
    Mychalczak, Borys
    Gewanter, Richard
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (04): : 905 - 913
  • [6] Who benefits from hypofractionated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: evidence from meta-analysis
    Sun, Linbin
    Zhu, Shimiao
    Zhao, Yang
    Zhang, Hui
    Shang, Zhiqun
    Jiang, Ning
    Li, Gang
    Niu, Yuanjie
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (10) : 9911 - 9918
  • [7] Clinical Potential of Statins in Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Hutchinson, Jack
    Marignol, Laure
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (10) : 5363 - 5372
  • [8] Is Ultrahypofractionated Whole Pelvis Radiation Therapy (WPRT) as Well Tolerated as Conventionally Fractionated WPRT in Patients With Prostate Cancer? Early Results From the HOPE Trial
    Mendez, Lucas C.
    Crook, Juanita
    Martell, Kevin
    Schaly, Bryan
    Hoover, Douglas A.
    Dhar, Aneesh
    Velker, Vikram
    Ahmad, Belal
    Lock, Michael
    Halperin, Ross
    Warner, Andrew
    Bauman, Glenn S.
    D'Souza, David P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 119 (03): : 803 - 812
  • [9] Acute toxicity of robotic ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy CyberKnife™ in prostate cancer patients
    Glowacki, G.
    Majewski, W.
    Wojcieszek, P.
    Grabinska, K.
    Chawinska, E.
    Bodusz, D.
    Wozniak, G.
    Urbanczyk, H.
    Kaletka, A.
    Miszczyk, L.
    NEOPLASMA, 2015, 62 (04) : 674 - 682
  • [10] Current Approach in Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Cetin, Ilknur Alsan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2020, 19 (02): : 49 - 55