Long-term Intrathecal Drug Administration for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain

被引:31
|
作者
Duarte, Rui V. [1 ,2 ]
Raphael, Jon H. [1 ,2 ]
Sparkes, Elizabeth [1 ,3 ]
Southall, Jane L. [2 ]
LeMarchand, Karen [2 ]
Ashford, Robert L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham City Univ, Fac Hlth, Birmingham B15 3TN, W Midlands, England
[2] Russells Hall Hosp, Dept Pain Management, Dudley, England
[3] Coventry Univ, Dept Psychol, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
chronic nonmalignant pain; intrathecal drug delivery systems; prospective long-term follow-up; sensory and psychosocial variables; OPIOID-INDUCED HYPERALGESIA; SPINAL-CORD COMPRESSION; CHRONIC NONCANCER PAIN; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INFLAMMATORY MASSES; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MORPHINE THERAPY; CANCER PAIN; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1097/ANA.0b013e31822ff779
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Chronic pain of nonmalignant origin requires effective long-term treatments, as for many patients pain management will be necessary throughout the rest of their lives. Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) have become a recognized therapy for the management of severe and otherwise intractable chronic pain. However, it is still not clear whether this treatment can be effective for periods up to 10 years or longer, given the paucity of long-term follow-up. This study sought to examine the effectiveness of IDDS following an average of 13 years postimplantation. Methods: Twenty patients participated in a longitudinal study with an average follow-up of 13.5 years (range: 10.4 to 17.9) after IDDS implantation. Investigation was carried out by means of a questionnaire before IDDS and after an average of 4 and 13 years of IDDS therapy. Assessment of pharmacological data and complications/side effects was performed. Results: Statistically significant improvements between baseline and 4-year assessment were observed for the following sensory and psychosocial variables: pain intensity, pain relief, coping, self-efficacy, depression, quality of life, housework, mobility, sleep, and social life (all P < 0.001). No statistically significant changes were detected between assessments at averages of 4 and 13.5 years. Conclusions: This study, with one of the longest follow-up intervals reported in the IDDS literature, shows that IDDS has the potential to be a life-long pain management solution in appropriately selected patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference-2012: Recommendations to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in Intrathecal Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Chronic Pain
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Levy, Robert
    Prager, Joshua
    Buchser, Eric
    Burton, Allen
    Caraway, David
    Cousins, Michael
    De Andres, Jose
    Diwan, Sudhir
    Erdek, Michael
    Grigsby, Eric
    Huntoon, Marc
    Jacobs, Marilyn S.
    Kim, Philip
    Kumar, Krishna
    Leong, Michael
    Liem, Liong
    McDowell, Gladstone C., II
    Panchal, Sunil
    Rauck, Richard
    Saulino, Michael
    Sitzman, B. Todd
    Staats, Peter
    Stanton-Hicks, Michael
    Stearns, Lisa
    Wallace, Mark
    Willis, K. Dean
    Witt, William
    Yaksh, Tony
    Mekhail, Nagy
    NEUROMODULATION, 2012, 15 (05): : 467 - 482
  • [22] Best Practices for Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Pain
    Prager, Joshua
    Deer, Timothy
    Levy, Robert
    Bruel, Brian
    Buchser, Eric
    Caraway, David
    Cousins, Michael
    Jacobs, Marilyn
    McGlothlen, Gail
    Rauck, Richard
    Staats, Peter
    Stearns, Lisa
    NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 (04): : 354 - 372
  • [23] DOSE CHANGES IN LONG-TERM AND MEDIUM-TERM INTRATHECAL MORPHINE THERAPY OF CANCER PAIN
    SCHULTHEISS, R
    SCHRAMM, J
    NEIDHARDT, J
    DENNIS, GC
    PENN, RD
    NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 31 (04) : 664 - 670
  • [24] Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain
    Noble, M.
    Treadwell, J. R.
    Tregear, S. J.
    Coates, V. H.
    Wiffen, P. J.
    Akafomo, C.
    Schoelles, K. M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01):
  • [25] Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Advances and Applications in the Management of Chronic Pain Patient
    De Andres, Jose
    Hayek, Salim
    Perruchoud, Christophe
    Lawrence, Melinda M.
    Reina, Miguel Angel
    De Andres-Serrano, Carmen
    Rubio-Haro, Ruben
    Hunt, Mathew
    Yaksh, Tony L.
    FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 3
  • [26] Patient Selection and Outcomes Using a Low-Dose Intrathecal Opioid Trialing Method for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain
    Grider, Jay S.
    Harned, Michael E.
    Etscheidt, Mark A.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2011, 14 (04) : 343 - 351
  • [27] Intrathecal Drug Delivery Systems for the Management of Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations
    Duarte, Rui V.
    Lambe, Tosin
    Raphael, Jon H.
    Eldabe, Sam
    Andronis, Lazaros
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (05) : 666 - 686
  • [28] The dosage and administration of long-term intrathecal baclofen therapy for severe spasticity of spinal origin
    Kawano, Osamu
    Masuda, Muneaki
    Takao, Tsuneaki
    Sakai, Hiroaki
    Morishita, Yuichiro
    Hayashi, Tetsuo
    Uetal, Takayoshi
    Maeda, Takeshi
    SPINAL CORD, 2018, 56 (10) : 996 - 999
  • [29] Open-label study of the safety and effectiveness of long-term therapy with extended-release tramadol in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain
    Pascual, Maria Luz G.
    Fleming, Rosa Rosanna B.
    Gana, Theolphilus J.
    Vorsanger, Gary J.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2007, 23 (10) : 2531 - 2542
  • [30] Medical Cannabis for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain Management
    Hameed, Maha
    Prasad, Sakshi
    Jain, Esha
    Dogrul, Bekir Nihat
    Al-Oleimat, Ahmad
    Pokhrel, Bidushi
    Chowdhury, Selia
    Co, Edzel Lorraine
    Mitra, Saloni
    Quinonez, Jonathan
    Ruxmohan, Samir
    Stein, Joel
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2023, 27 (04) : 57 - 63