Integrating gene expression profiling into NCCN high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma management recommendations: impact on patient management

被引:19
作者
Farberg, Aaron S. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, Mary A. [3 ]
Douglas, Leah [4 ]
Covington, Kyle R. [3 ]
Kurley, Sarah J. [3 ]
Cook, Robert W. [3 ]
Dinehart, Scott M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dermatol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Arkansas Dermatol Skin Canc Ctr, Dermatol, Little Rock, AR USA
[3] Castle Biosci Inc, Res & Dev, Friendswood, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dermatol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; metastasis risk; gene expression profile; tumor biology; patient management; EXPANDED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY TESTS; BREAST-CANCER MANAGEMENT; NODAL METASTASIS; 8TH EDITION; MELANOMA; GUIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; POPULATION; PROGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1080/03007995.2020.1763284
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To integrate gene expression profiling into the management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) within the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines to improve risk-aligned management recommendations. Methods: A cohort of 300 NCCN-defined high-risk cSCC patients, along with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage, Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) T stage, and known patient outcomes were analyzed. Risk classifications using a validated 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test and T stage were applied to NCCN patient management guidelines. Risk-directed patient management recommendations within the NCCN guidelines framework were aligned based on risk for metastasis. Results: Of the 300 NCCN high-risk cSCC patients, 159 (53.0%) were 40-GEP Class 1 and AJCC T1-T2, and 173 (57.7%) were Class 1 and BWH T1-2a, indicating low risk for metastasis and, thereby, suggesting low management intensity. The 40-GEP integration suggested high intensity management for only 24 (8.0%) patients (all Class 2B), and moderate intensity management for the remainder of the cohort. Conclusions: The 40-GEP test can be integrated within existing NCCN guideline recommendations for managing cSCC patients to help refine risk-directed management decisions. Integration of the 40-GEP test would allow >50% of this NCCN-defined high-risk cohort to be managed with the lowest intensity recommendations within the broad NCCN guidelines. High intensity management was deemed risk-appropriate for a small subpopulation (8.0%). This study demonstrates that the 40-GEP test, in combination with T stage, has clinical utility to impact patient management decisions in NCCN high-risk cSCC for improving risk-aligned management within the NCCN guidelines framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1307
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Current clinical practice: differential management of uveal melanoma in the era of molecular tumor analyses
    Aaberg, Thomas M., Jr.
    Cook, Robert W.
    Oelschlager, Kristen
    Maetzold, Derek
    Rao, P. Kumar
    Mason, John O., III
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 2449 - 2460
  • [2] Guidelines of care for the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
    Alam, Murad
    Armstrong, April
    Baum, Christian
    Bordeaux, Jeremy S.
    Brown, Marc
    Busam, Klaus J.
    Eisen, Daniel B.
    Iyengar, Vivek
    Lober, Clifford
    Margolis, David J.
    Messina, Jane
    Miller, Alexander
    Miller, Stanley
    Mostow, Eliot
    Mowad, Christen
    Nehal, Kishwer
    Schmitt-Burr, Kristi
    Sekulic, Aleksandar
    Storrs, Paul
    Teng, Joyce
    Yu, Siegrid
    Huang, Conway
    Boyer, Kevin
    Begolka, Wendy Smith
    Bichakjian, Christopher
    Kim, John Y. S.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    Mittal, Bharat
    Moyer, Jeffrey
    Olenecki, Thomas
    Rodgers, Phillip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 78 (03) : 560 - 578
  • [3] Alford Ashley V, 2017, Rev Urol, V19, P221, DOI 10.3909/riu0772
  • [4] Amin M.B., 2017, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, V8th
  • [5] The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Brookland, Robert K.
    Meyer, Laura
    Gress, Donna M.
    Byrd, David R.
    Winchester, David P.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, Skin cancer facts and statistics
  • [7] Mohs Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Belkin, Daniel
    Carucci, John A.
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2011, 29 (02) : 161 - +
  • [8] Clinical impact of a 31-gene expression profile test for cutaneous melanoma in 156 prospectively and consecutively tested patients
    Berger, Adam C.
    Davidson, Robert S.
    Poitras, J. Kevin
    Chabra, Indy
    Hope, Richard
    Brackeen, Amy
    Johnson, Clare E.
    Maetzold, Derek J.
    Middlebrook, Brooke
    Oelschlager, Kristen M.
    Cook, Robert W.
    Monzon, Federico A.
    Miller, Alexander R.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (09) : 1599 - 1604
  • [9] Analytic validity of DecisionDx-Melanoma, a gene expression profile test for determining metastatic risk in melanoma patients
    Cook, Robert W.
    Middlebrook, Brooke
    Wilkinson, Jeff
    Covington, Kyle R.
    Oelschlager, Kristen
    Monzon, Federico A.
    Stone, John F.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [10] Dillon LD., 2018, SKIN J Cutan Med, V2, P111, DOI [10.25251/skin.2.2.3, DOI 10.25251/SKIN.2.2.3]