Postanesthesia care unit delirium following robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective observational study

被引:8
作者
Beck, Stefanie [1 ]
Hoop, Dennis [1 ]
Ragab, Haissam [1 ]
Rademacher, Cornelius [1 ]
Messner-Schmitt, Aurelie [1 ]
von Breunig, Franziska [1 ]
Haese, Alexander [2 ]
Graefen, Markus [2 ]
Zoellner, Christian [1 ]
Fischer, Marlene [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Anesthesiol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Intens Care Med, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
anesthesia; postoperative delirium; postoperative neurocognitive disorders; radical prostatectomy; Trendelenburg position; POSTOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; TRENDELENBURG POSITION; CEREBROVASCULAR AUTOREGULATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ANESTHESIA; PROPOFOL; PRESSURE; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.2094
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the extreme Trendelenburg position and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) in supine position. Methods Patients were screened for delirium signs 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following extubation. Results PACU delirium was present in 39.3% of RARP (64/163) patients and 41.8% of ORP (77/184) patients. Higher age (OR 1.072, 95%CI: 1.034-1.111, P < .001), total intravenous anesthesia (OR 2.001, 95%CI: 1.243-3.221, P = .004), and anesthesia duration (OR 1.255, 95%CI: 1.067-1.476, P = .006) were associated with PACU delirium, but no association was found between surgical technique and PACU delirium. Conclusion Compared with inhalational anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-sufentanil, higher age, and longer duration of anesthesia were associated with PACU delirium. Based on these findings, adverse effects on postoperative recovery and delirium signs do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy. Trial registration , identifier: DRKS00010014.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review
    Ilic, Dragan
    Evans, Sue M.
    Allan, Christie Ann
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Murphy, Declan
    Frydenberg, Mark
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 845 - 853
  • [42] Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy Cancer Control
    Hu, Jim C.
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Abdollah, Firas
    Chamie, Karim
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Sun, Maxine
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) : 666 - 672
  • [43] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after previous open transvesical adenomectomy
    Bove A.M.
    Altobelli E.
    Sergi F.
    Buscarini M.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2014, 8 (1) : 85 - 88
  • [44] Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Bondad, Jasper
    Vasdev, Nikhil
    Adshead, Jim
    Lane, Tim
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Khan, Mohammed S.
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Guru, Khurshid
    Chlosta, Piotr L.
    Aboumarzouk, Omar M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (06) : 765 - 779
  • [45] Utility of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia Following Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Funamizu, Naotake
    Mineta, Sho
    Ozaki, Takahiro
    Mishima, Kohei
    Igarashi, Kazuharu
    Omura, Kenji
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    Wakabayashi, G. O.
    IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (03): : 1432 - 1437
  • [46] Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy
    Hanna, Nawar
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Sun, Maxine
    Friedlander, David F.
    Seisen, Thomas
    Abdollah, Firas
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Menon, Mani
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (03) : 88.e1 - 88.e9
  • [47] Surgical Results and Complications for Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Reverse Systematic Review
    Moretti, Tomas Bernardo Costa
    Magna, Luis Alberto
    Reis, Leonardo Oliveira
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 : 150 - 161
  • [48] Robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Pilot study for the prospective evaluation of perioperative parameters compared to open radical cystectomy
    Niegisch, G.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Albers, P.
    UROLOGE, 2011, 50 (09): : 1076 - 1082
  • [49] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (02) : 236 - 244
  • [50] Comparison of intra- and postoperative analgesia and pain perception in robot-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy
    Knipper, Sophie
    Hagedorn, Moritz
    Sadat-Khonsari, Maryam
    Tian, Zhe
    Karakiewicz, Pierre, I
    Tilki, Derya
    Heinzer, Hans
    Michl, Uwe
    Steuber, Thomas
    von Breunig, Franziska
    Zoeller, Christian
    Graefen, Markus
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 1451 - 1457